Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Mon, 28 March 2016 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A56C12D874 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.06
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.06 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org header.d=gondrom.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xaEET-w6QnVY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lvps5-35-241-16.dedicated.hosteurope.de (www.gondrom.org [5.35.241.16]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B9BD12D100 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.65.2.199] (unknown [218.188.76.249]) by lvps5-35-241-16.dedicated.hosteurope.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6007F632E9; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:17:14 +0200 (CEST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=mf6rsDW1zUmRYA41T3vG6kYBv7EvSRyAOSp4v7J+zqd2jCiTiTUqNmHA+C7JRYPVex+ISNWZjnjbqseC41TZZhaUtLpkc3yNu/AaxX03azKj0DOnagHQqAG7vPa16wIn4ykStqAazgqckBEIqawUXKuPSaysaKSTQX+Jd1kt05Y=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
Message-ID: <56F912B8.9070001@gondrom.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:17:12 +0800
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, sm+ietf@elandsys.com
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
References: <20160316170239.30920.41218.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160318005648.0e552fc8@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net> <081801d188e1$3ea75d70$bbf61850$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <081801d188e1$3ea75d70$bbf61850$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/r29n4cD5JiWuK5QjnYx2cCaH1Vc>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:17:20 -0000

Hello all,

Yes. The comment period is ending soon and we will be reviewing the 
responses to the call for review
and getting back to the community at that time.

Thank you all for your feedback and input. Please be assured, we are of 
course and indeed reading the ietf list and your comments and will be 
including the input together.

Best regards, Tobias (IAOC Chair)


On 28/03/16 19:01, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> I didn't see a response to mine of 16th March, either.
> I assumed that the IAOC would be bunching together the input and then sending a
> considered reply.
> Adrian
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of S Moonesamy
>> Sent: 28 March 2016 11:37
>> To: Tobias Gondrom
>> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
>>
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> The IAOC solicited community input about a proposed IETF Privacy
>> Policy [1] on 16 March.  I sent an email on 18 March in which I asked
>> a few questions [2].  I neither received any answers to those
>> questions nor did I find any answers in the ietf@ietf.org mailing
>> list archive.  I tried to find out whether there were any answers in
>> the IAOC minutes.  I could not find any (published) minutes for
>> January or February.
>>
>> I would appreciate if you could bring those questions to the
>> attention of the IAOC and provide the answers.
>>
>> Regards,
>> S. Moonesamy
>>
>> 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97181.html
>> 2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97207.html