Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com

Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com> Wed, 23 October 2013 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DAD11E8182 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQpclcn1+Lj5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x229.google.com (mail-pb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B29111E81FB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rp16so1368351pbb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=iWz1qlrOAarDViNpE5AzVscTEo4I6TCQKnKB6swW8RM=; b=TpfBtOqlGQEz04dz/ZXFauOVRoQQr9Qr07LNyBTswtgLljiVcdM4bhmRfty+hcWmXZ ZECHK23jP0FuPfoVA4Dnc7zFCeraArPf/KpSlEfUHJGtoegheGFFL/IC2hUVIXd/36ee aIBHNsnn8upJgGWZaD7LKt8EexHsroCJTQklXG1jtiJaEQCJUIxvM8x2J9toaa/yorsD 2XQSs9F5wvzSxS30GSEQ6wrSwXm1sbGhfupy4K9v2/PybT6BxtW4O4oWxb/eAI2OvZVX /ugAeTir9QuSSiaRJxA72ve4GIL8nutVTQoOLfRSAH7L6+zqEsK5ys/71wmVb6+PeWJB GomA==
X-Received: by 10.68.244.2 with SMTP id xc2mr3123536pbc.58.1382553437266; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.116] (c-24-6-103-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.103.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ef10sm43012756pac.1.2013.10.23.11.37.15 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
From: Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <m28uxkyovt.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:37:14 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0C97F189-9748-4DCC-8BAC-AA7DAE9EF1F1@gmail.com>
References: <5262FB95.8080500@gmail.com> <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com> <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com> <m21u3d5zvo.wl%randy@psg.com> <5266B4A4.9020301@dcrocker.net> <5266C6CA.30900@gmail.com> <0B5A250AE70FD6B21DD3CF4C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5266CE7C.2020503@gmail.com> <61EE8145-2184-44C1-8163-424F97F8286C@piuha.net> <m261sp3u13.wl%randy@psg.com> <7F387505-3EBD-4DEC-8E9C-AB6D500F5396@nominum.com> <CAPv4CP-UPr5S8Z5PqF1bX0FWLOCZvrgjFog6-O-R8tN+ygVTCA@mail.gmail.com> <CF9872C2-828D-4C56-8A8D-836FF1BCDAA9@nominum.com> <m28uxkyovt.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:37:40 -0000

On Oct 23, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> the chilling effect of vigilateism is far worse than spam or trolls.
> we've been dealing with the latter for decades, and there is little
> actual real harm if any.  the chilling effect of vigilanteism causes
> actual harm and reduces the rich diversity of opinion, culture, and
> viewpoint.

Dear Randy,

I agree. It seems some think greater progress is made by ignoring any definition of fair treatment.  

Regards,
Douglas Otis