Conclusion of last calls for RFC2460bis, RFC4291bis, and RFC1981bis
Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Fri, 03 March 2017 05:27 UTC
Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8E5129663 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:27:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7eUvs1oLtjC6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (usplmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7803412948B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:27:50 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c618062d-d5fff700000009d8-d0-58b90f6d07bc
Received: from EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.81]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 8A.DB.02520.D6F09B85; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:38:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 00:27:44 -0500
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Conclusion of last calls for RFC2460bis, RFC4291bis, and RFC1981bis
Thread-Topic: Conclusion of last calls for RFC2460bis, RFC4291bis, and RFC1981bis
Thread-Index: AQHSk97hobOkCrKftk+HVG0JRUsb1A==
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 05:27:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D5DD1ADB-8B5A-49DA-9250-0FF601A690BF@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.12]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_65D0B9EE-EC01-4701-B405-A675E047D732"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPoG4h/84IgxOKFs82zmdxYPRYsuQn UwBjFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfGoYYDzAUdRhXd/5sYGxg/6XcxcnJICJhIzL/UxtrFyMUhJLCe UeLW3Y2MEM4yRom3rZ+ZQKrYgKo27ISwRQSUJQ7MvMEKYgsL+Ej8mzOFDSIeLHHw9FZ2CFtP oqf1OVicRUBF4vOGSWD1vAL2Es09/WBzGAXEJL6fWgNmMwuIS9x6Mp8J4iIRiYcXT7NB2KIS Lx//Y4WwlSTmvL7GDHIcs8AURon7rQfZIIYKSpyc+YRlAqPgLCSzZiGrm4WkDqJIW2LZwtfM sxg5gGwdickLGSHCphKvj36Esq0lZvyCaGUWUJSY0v2QfQEjxypGjtLigpzcdCODTYzA0D8m waa7g/H+dM9DjAIcjEo8vBuyd0QIsSaWFVfmHmJUAWp9tGH1BUYplrz8vFQlEd60vUBp3pTE yqrUovz4otKc1OJDjNIcLErivHGr74cLCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUaGJOKHjHcK2Jg2xyw 9Mua2UHSzeF61rzT+nbrbNor11fDqGPjJXp2Tu+UiSePuL9dVtG0RDHdwMmwVdbnpN7bD26/ xH5JcV1jjuCVPNrJph0kY+T22Hv/jO+q6jOKKkuTms4LBKr1SQote/mv2fXNk6u+r+cGlgeo cUcYMYTFsCWHOC74f+yhEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAy1PUU4UCAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rBU7xBtGFmCLQvJd98eWTwnDoWo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 05:27:51 -0000
Hi all, The IETF Last Calls on these following documents draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08 draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07 draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04 have concluded. The last calls resulted in extensive and lively discussion that has raised several important points (and the discussion on the 4291bis document is still ongoing). I am working with the document shepherd and the editor to summarize the discussions and to propose a way forward for each of these documents. We expect to do this within a few days. Regards Suresh
- Conclusion of last calls for RFC2460bis, RFC4291b… Suresh Krishnan