Re: IETF Process Evolution
Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Fri, 16 September 2005 21:29 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EGNlj-0004JA-Vo; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:29:15 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EGNlh-0004J2-A4 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:29:13 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA20540 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:29:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGNql-0004iV-GP for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:34:28 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (adsl-71-131-50-87.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [71.131.50.87]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8GLTgJF018651 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:29:43 -0700
Message-ID: <432B3918.9080303@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:28:56 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
References: <E1EGI1e-00038I-8N@newodin.ietf.org> <p06230901bf509c2b07b4@[192.168.1.4]> <03c301c5baed$f2aa4df0$75087c0a@china.huawei.com> <p0623090abf50c3b34bc6@[192.168.1.4]>
In-Reply-To: <p0623090abf50c3b34bc6@[192.168.1.4]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Found to be clean
X-Songbird-From: dhc2@dcrocker.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF Process Evolution
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
> Groups like NomCom and IPR have taken on tasks and done them, with community > discussion of their charters and with community discussion as their documents > went through the process. They are process change groups, and they work. Ted, Groups like nomcom and ipr have not had a multi-year crisis with a history of extensive activity and little measurable improvement to show for it. (How long ago was Yokohama?) So, Ted, how long should be allocated for this process to define a charter to define a working group that will define process changes? How long to get community acceptance for it? How long to get a resulting working group to produce something useful? And since all other public development efforts for process change have frankly fallen flat, as Brian has cited, what is your basis for believing that a working group charter will somehow make yet-another public process more effective at developing a specification for change? Design teams design solutions, not plans for solutions or charters for working groups. If the design team knows enough about its topic -- especially when the topic is complex and not all that well understood -- it is usually a far more effective vehicle for solution specification than is the working group framework. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF Process Evolution C. M. Heard
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Process Evolution John C Klensin
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Pekka Savola
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Process Evolution JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Leslie Daigle
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IETF Process Evolution Brian E Carpenter