Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Dave,

On 2015-02-11 21:44, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Swap the focus.  Rather than seeking to characterize the clueless, let's
> characterize folk who are much more likely to be clueful:

Would be a blessing :)
>
>       Ensure that at least a portion of the Nomcom has contributed in
> formal, documented way.  AD, Chair, author.. whatever set of activities
> we feel makes it likely they will have clue.

I guess I'm old-time minded here, what is wrong with 3 meetings out
of 5, and if you want co-authored document.
>
>
> As for Loa's question about why someone who hasn't done real IETF work
> would want to volunteer, the answer is politics and/or ego.  They or
> their company might want to hold sway over nomcom or the person might
> just want to add this to their resume.

With due respect - I don't think this is how it work, do we have any
running code? Our rules so far has not stopped anyone form paying and
register, sit at the back of a a couple of wg meetings and three IETF
meetings later drop his/her name into the hat. But has it happened?

/Loa

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]