IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists

Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com> Fri, 25 April 2014 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE391A020C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 02:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AfD-iSnqqHKR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 02:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E0E1A02D0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 02:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id rd3so2955919pab.37 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 02:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Lr0n+UsvNRlesrAfTv2BH0U6t4SR7wwdJGYiRE/BJGs=; b=AEKsy4xWqthsAufvxE1rAZ0VVKd1ZQVdeXmTn9qUEOS96LAlY25iCjFzEOoAsaVsnA tjAaiXYLAzggVcXgt0JRpcMB0PjOwws7DQGsHBj8+/DrRXhP+U2xGkLlf76nV/8rRqxt HLOGdhS+D0e563il1TKrpWjOVwL+2fRdiKFln7jCaTTDGYQoFLpiiOwJ4GCPm+KwauI7 EV2aViSIxj0Wy5oV18n9h4q2sFNjhacrlZ1AkTBZ2nKHbw9y8BziIMGXHWuPgWkhgHbd WvWWnlS1wad1MRqSlwzxuBkk91BEC0iaHoytg2y3C7nUaAGU2jqvLQUG3hZdzsvYHi6E C5pQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.160.34 with SMTP id xh2mr6364459pab.109.1398417189472; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 02:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.150] (c-24-4-159-60.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.4.159.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z3sm35012186pas.15.2014.04.25.02.13.07 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 02:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
From: Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DC6E3687-2567-42D3-B6E3-B594132A3BCD@nominum.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 02:13:07 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B627E61C-D207-4932-A6A4-BB611505FC0B@gmail.com>
References: <20140425002622.E6DFA1ACE0@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <7859156.ek3Qf5sxiO@scott-latitude-e6320> <57E35BDB-30DF-4829-A6CE-F1132E0C2EFC@gmail.com> <DC6E3687-2567-42D3-B6E3-B594132A3BCD@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rHmbC9bdQgnoK3y9fNWuT2589sg
Cc: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:13:19 -0000

On Apr 24, 2014, at 7:23 PM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Apr 24, 2014, at 9:41 PM, Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The US government failed to protect citizen's rights by not declaring ISPs common carriers.
> 
> Is this conversation really appropriate for the IETF mailing list?

Dear Ted,

Protocols related to pervasive monitoring, reduced security, or granting overwhelming control to a select few at an expense of many should be valid topics within the IETF.  These larger questions can and should provide some guidance in setting group priorities.

Regards,
Douglas Otis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email