Re: Preferred usage "Internet Drafts" vs "Internet-Drafts"
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 14 August 2016 20:11 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65FA12D7BA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ACB_RPznfkz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692D612D187 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x233.google.com with SMTP id fi15so10711377pac.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FWjTRCQ/uCEQ+pLhCN+FTJaEZ3mRflhiKiQyAKdeLhI=; b=cvL4JS1sx4ZwJsuWWDQnD8SbxmVXqUOkA0/gatMCLUqEk6VcoB7tNMO0fSTtNRN0Tk LAFhviBBSoDBTvqt/AuTY8RsoUo0EVGyP4s42f5TWuuu2N2yJvbrSG6Z8o4N3gxlLiH7 OTZbDl9CtMoa+l6OpIRXeDWQImOc+g7RlT3U+Y99TqbaeO/NCPpyaRj3QCDzrDFDlMq6 qs3NEtHYfWHOcrqBG3bj6QfQzMctmI+iIrb+FPA6iQPaDmpl+TereELUrUS6ITdLA1i2 ucxxhcnMVKC0kvaaPylxeSHeUtzTefg3BcaYyaVaXAhQnNlfRi7N/Bj7ZGqTkOq1F4Sq Nb4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FWjTRCQ/uCEQ+pLhCN+FTJaEZ3mRflhiKiQyAKdeLhI=; b=ewI0uUhAkqhUJl2MiGiM2Y5bCAJSYsCRKVXIUK1xOg2YqxmGLzJUzplwk1GXCWEQ4C 1jWWp4Tpki1vj1/VQWpoUQuK3e43ANANCrMXz2gXdzkZhVqyvW3FEgMaYd2cwJqyGuZF DOaraJREorn1Wz337+2QBcT3dfF+TGYsGrwfrsTffXsdcpUyQjllVVE/IZtPNim912jx IPV/XlUOCB9zEqKDE0dQPVLQak8WOqPGKaYSwLt9UJcgQa/b/98IFu5YvOuZpgda+rXc OpyCQcs6KItLuSvGz7FWhFPPCXxjUci8mn3ugLHvGx803be1LPAdHwSHzN9jQ/cnLO5f hkrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooustnuHjh9D8LSW3QBI64aPOMbYOuEzeT6jRvsRQjy9cw+7It28be1Y6DUNUUMfsLw==
X-Received: by 10.66.74.103 with SMTP id s7mr47191057pav.1.1471205502851; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7af7:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7af7:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 75sm27620761pfw.92.2016.08.14.13.11.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Preferred usage "Internet Drafts" vs "Internet-Drafts"
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <a3562189-c861-a221-9a2b-412364228474@softarmor.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <90208e74-6a3b-54ff-0b86-b228641f29c7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:11:38 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a3562189-c861-a221-9a2b-412364228474@softarmor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rJpSUQZoKEkhOD5st4QwosHgC7A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:11:45 -0000
On 15/08/2016 04:40, Dean Willis wrote: > Okay, this is probably trivial. My life is trivia. > > As a matter of style. I think of "internet drafts" as the documents we > process, and "internet-drafts" as the role-name for the I-D administrator. > > The IETF web site mixes the usage. See: https://www.ietf.org/id-info/ > > The tao uses the hyphenated form: https://www.ietf.org/tao.html > > Is there an actual preference in the community, or is the usage seen as > completely equivalent and interchangeable? If we want to be formal, BCP 9 (RFC 2026) uses "Internet-Draft" (but with one exception, not noted in the Errata). Brian
- Re: Preferred usage "Internet Drafts" vs "Interne… Brian E Carpenter
- Preferred usage "Internet Drafts" vs "Internet-Dr… Dean Willis