IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Daughter of CODEC (was Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb)

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141031AE21C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:20:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id in7_vgv_ECCQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:20:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9153E1ADFD0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:20:23 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7f2c8e000006d25-9f-529ef3d35503
Received: from ESESSHC013.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AA.67.27941.3D3FE925; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:20:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [131.160.126.190] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:20:17 +0100
Message-ID: <529EF3C2.9000303@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:20:02 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Subject: Re: Daughter of CODEC (was Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb)
References: <DUB127-W23531D0E8B15570331DB51E0EE0@phx.gbl> <52974AA8.6080702@cisco.com> <CAKFn1SHMBG=Rwq8SNJkPz6EUD9O9P+0gTD569_5eXc7ndBpYRQ@mail.gmail.com> <529A0A4A.1040107@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMB44JYj-hkp_O72f2yg-OtBuyqN=NC3aW2PBvh7ZO-kBw@mail.gmail.com> <529BC7B1.8070205@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBJ7mktXepDckaOTBcP3wZ4e-MM7cmu_=RFJymKNr5xuA@mail.gmail.com> <12721589-7B67-49C9-99E5-CBE96BE45F11@standardstrack.com> <CABmDk8kxED6bvrGoHCcsXCEhpa3-qQL_ZQO8xmUBV1Kt96ELjA@mail.gmail.com> <529EF265.5000808@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <529EF265.5000808@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre7lz/OCDBa02lhM29XLavFs43wW i723fjNbTO2ztTi2p5/ZgdVj56y77B5Llvxk8pi8cRaLR1PnYnaPuXteMAewRnHZpKTmZJal FunbJXBlLF67jL3gN2vF1JlH2RoYL7B0MXJySAiYSGxfdBLKFpO4cG89WxcjF4eQwBFGiYl/ rkI5axgluqadYwSp4hXQlph87Bk7iM0ioCIx7d8vsDibgIXEllv3wSaJCkRJnD/3kgmiXlDi 5MwnYHERgVqJX3famEFsZgFTibsTl4HVCAv4S5yZeYcVYtkfZokzBx6ADeUU0JJ4vWIhUBEH 0HniEj2NQRC9ehJTrrYwQtjyEtvfzgGbKQR02/JnLSwTGIVmIVk9C0nLLCQtCxiZVzFyFKcW J+WmGxlsYgQG+sEtvy12MF7+a3OIUZqDRUmc9+Nb5yAhgfTEktTs1NSC1KL4otKc1OJDjEwc nFINjDYa9+8eaf4lqXRP3Sjz7Vz3Z8f3n7A6HXfd/+f3zWedytzdmFe/Zip4eGzXHqPHSlF8 8lWn50d8m6Te2/lG68ETLtbULPZbbev+7Fq6YM6RtbtS/Oc7yTunnz3TvHvWTzdzpus8KWXm O1bnHHeb35BhJvbqobfBvUsXD+ptftUcVcW1PMI4OlSJpTgj0VCLuag4EQCGKmSHQgIAAA==
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:20:26 -0000

Hi,

yes, we are monitoring this effort. The reason why it has not been
chartered yet is a lack of cycles in the main proponents, who are
fairly busy contributing to other aspects of RTCWeb (among other
things). Richard is the responsible AD for this effort.

Cheers,

Gonzalo


On 04/12/2013 11:14 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 12/2/13 10:15 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>> We had a videocodec bof  @IETF-85 and the WG just never got 
>> chartered: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/BofIETF85. 
>> Perhaps the ADs can fill in the gap as to why that didn't happen
>> as I'm not sure whether a ball was dropped or there was a reason
>> not to charter.
> 
> Yes, it would be helpful to hear from the ADs about that.
> 
> Peter
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email