Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E13821F8BC4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 00:07:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eaoyE+z-ylkM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 00:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7333E21F8BBE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 00:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78E620B27 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 03:07:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 03:07:32 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=2iM51FZIz3XCi/Zw7br1o1 +C3s8=; b=t0iwe3C8vxb23b/DGqudtSPO7U0MOmoH4xnNE9c4Qhjf6a7CioYC1g jVKQpJCXb9mYb4NrToWojjX6sXZgUQv4JYBG0kiCbbnbfp28A77fMFvYfmh2uqEw TXqZkqAef206xQfHpFXCIvE675cpny3ABLus4ghBOPDJsi5dJQ+80=
X-Sasl-enc: /M0gp6NRB6ofC7xryS3SLlt1+GBDbBCosLvbtaXgzJQX 1354435652
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (unknown [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4FF3648249F; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 03:07:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <50BB0C3F.9000008@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 03:07:27 -0500
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes)
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <50B5C839.4060909@gmail.com> <59924CD37D50616BA8EB8EF7@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121128023905.0afdcde0@resistor.net> <50B683C4.2030503@stpeter.im> <50B68612.7080107@dcrocker.net> <50B693ED.7000609@stpeter.im> <50B696B0.30904@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAC4RtVAG+pKSQMwPyB6GJ7jxJM4hNpU81Yt8he6ZsEMrg_rTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <00c001cdce7a$d9fa6490$8def2db0$@asgard.org> <50B7EA5D.2030803@qti.qualcomm.com> <50BA18B8.3090306@network-heretics.com> <p06240609cce032de76ff@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <m2obidvuv7.wl%randy@psg.com> <50BAF558.5040805@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50BAF558.5040805@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:07:44 -0000

On 12/02/2012 01:29 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 12/1/12 9:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> sadly, too many of us remember writing on scrolls of acetate.  i
>> imagine that some remember stone and chisels.
> At the last meeting, for my own stuff I went with the old one-slide
> approach.  However, it did occur to me that by doing that the slide(s)
> lost its archival value (slim as that may have been) for people not
> in the room.  Anyway.
>
> Not really sure what can be done about this - you can say "discussion,
> not presentation" until you're blue in the face and the outcome of all
> that will be a blue face but presentations during the meetings anyway.
> Ultimately I expect it comes down to how individual chairs want to
> run meetings.

I think that organizations sometimes get into habits of doing things 
regardless of whether those things work well.  And the habits sometimes 
become so entrenched that it's considered heresy to suggest that they be 
changed.   Even individual chairs might have a difficult time changing 
those habits for their own working groups.

Keith