Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07

Joel Halpern <> Fri, 14 September 2018 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D9C12872C; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joel Halpern <>
To: <>
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:21:08 -0700
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 23:21:09 -0000

Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2018-09-14
IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-24
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard

Major issues:
    While I am still concerned (see my previous reviews) that this may well be
    the wrong answer to the wrong question, the authors have done a good job of
    explaining what they are doing and justifying why in some situations it
    will be useful.   That seems the appropriate standard, and thus the
    document is ready for publication.

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: