IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Old directions in social media.

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 08 January 2021 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCD03A0AB9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:22:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.179
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.179 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpF-iLUOSlBq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:22:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EA923A0943 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:22:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D985C0236; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:22:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Jan 2021 13:22:10 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=v8ft3h g2SLHD32Cw7FJwFjJWL44spDs6i4VnnpTi3gI=; b=PkvoHKtcXcl+IFvR/wQWhx FP8wjzVSZ9MuObrUdXdpF3HMdxfYlgclywNVxkkjzItVg+mjJu0hjcBCRZP5Q2If 1Vlvu9bUp2x/wzmJK1eKiMpjNirgVitH6XbSjIYzaJ35YGk4Nja+J10JBFAg9lQD AQWnDIBTFaadMXYeD/Y/QgKbGfrrJ7E2tZ+U3WPjFv4u1KGG1LRrT2I03AFFn7qU E2jsNtAtclZjO2OuLqxWn2duVzeqpGFKcFwgRgyhleAUuK89+fA71lQAAuCegIFY jTZlt2vsSkB46ygz8PjNHXSFQamzZmeTSNYv6zay8zHQiLcBKi/84ExBXe0auyKA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:0aL4X1ZQED6uqi85ULV5XgJDdBSssKl9KVliJTmRGlBD61XBwMYEUQ> <xme:0aL4X8aUXQCffXOy5DYeECWQUCPcZ9mXt8EJQTUn4OXd2LAM57pq2H5mWLeFIpEbe RhayuBM61yXUw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdeghedggeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtderredtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhh ucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevfeetudeigedtledvvddtudefjeejffdvfeetjeeiueel gfdtgfegtdffkeetudenucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:0aL4X3-Uag1TM5fhhOoq3x6bUZkSmk6jO3EKPjUAx3M2lCxW7203bg> <xmx:0aL4XzrAwsN0bfJ20_HImr-ytkpi2UkK3-YJENTOFd2cvq-VKdQ9KA> <xmx:0aL4Xwq5WxDPklYXLNuwmKwKxQwGpSLcmmjbmg2275WRnqqI3HguXQ> <xmx:0qL4X90vvrQ790zFlEgfFJWSN8uQu5_WYQY1a9BTz9bGukT0ry8odQ>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 36F5424005C; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:22:09 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Old directions in social media.
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CAMm+Lwg1-pxKU8vMinFDUbVca52VgFzTOOSJMnJjaUJvF6PLew@mail.gmail.com> <519a0e4d-7102-fac8-1517-04c590a80080@network-heretics.com> <MN2PR11MB43668BD4EE84EDCCA9C8062AB5D00@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <8d37d121-3f47-43b4-93ae-036068121b08@network-heretics.com> <91FCD1A5-050D-476D-8EEA-38CB43DE20F1@akamai.com> <CAMm+Lwgvats19N7P1um437_LXjNG2gLK9OZCQdWmWBD52Gbuwg@mail.gmail.com> <ybl35zb4drj.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CAJU8_nUH9htyhjPXnF3awt=kyrzULDsmFZSawpWPpxFVJ-kk+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <38287daa-dd67-fb58-938b-3cacb5bb488e@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 13:22:08 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nUH9htyhjPXnF3awt=kyrzULDsmFZSawpWPpxFVJ-kk+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------6D6B8B969022FCE0A7624D16"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rYQNV5mdgkkMGyURG18wtMqaEJM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 18:22:14 -0000

On 1/8/21 12:31 PM, Kyle Rose wrote:

> Staying on the same thread (so those who've muted can retain their 
> sanity), but resetting a bit...
>
> Instead of welcoming new ideas and new ways of working into the 
> milieu, and expressing appreciation that others want to put in effort 
> to contribute to this shared venture, you and others are suggesting we 
> micromanage the terms of engagement.

You say "new" as if it were inherently a Good Thing.  It's not. "New" is 
not by itself a good reason to welcome something.   That kind of 
argument is basically an appeal to prejudice, and an argument based on 
"new" vs. "old" is at best a distraction.    I'd like to see more 
insight as to why a tool or a way of working is better or worse than 
another.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email