Re: Status of RFC 20

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 07 December 2014 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27361A066B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 07:48:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EIqc2ZGmjwwd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 07:48:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D468C1A03AA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 07:48:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (xm3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sB7FmKnU003944 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 16:48:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from alma.local.informatik.uni-bremen.de (robin.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7972C33A; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 16:48:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: emacs 25.0.50.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Status of RFC 20
References: <20141206170611.39377.qmail@ary.lan> <54833B14.7010104@cs.tcd.ie> <D1B5A541041D2171FB90DA03@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAMm+LwhkLd-ZceXV2cXk6kqiF7Eo=9b47m6ghtThjCAo4TiNHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 16:47:56 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhkLd-ZceXV2cXk6kqiF7Eo=9b47m6ghtThjCAo4TiNHw@mail.gmail.com> (Phillip Hallam-Baker's message of "Sun, 7 Dec 2014 09:06:16 -0500")
Message-ID: <m0d27vsbpv.fsf@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (darwin)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rZMTVd32Y-TWMYXE-FcteoEn_pw
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 15:48:25 -0000

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> writes:

> it would
> be more appropriate to reformat RFC20 in the new presentation format.

Done:-)

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc20.txt.pdf

Grüße, Carsten