Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 06 March 2015 21:48 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FD41A1A8B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:48:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N6rsJ1jt4b5t for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45BD81A0100 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t26LlxZZ087948 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 15:47:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <54FA208A.3080400@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:47:54 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
References: <54D903C0.6050209@gmail.com> <B042A12A-8168-48DD-8808-326E1BFA7A8E@cisco.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D40E22FCD@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <54DB88B9.7010507@levkowetz.com> <54DB8D5C.2040508@dcrocker.net> <54DB904E.90008@levkowetz.com> <D11F2EF9.4781A%wesley.george@twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <D11F2EF9.4781A%wesley.george@twcable.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/re4zLP-2guKqJsZM4_meVZcMvD8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 21:48:02 -0000
Hi Wes - The pages that show you the alias expansions are available now (since version 5.11.1). See <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/email-aliases> for the whole set, and, for instance, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker/email-aliases/> if you're interested in a single draft. Similarly for groups, look at <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/email-aliases/> and, for example, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/sdn/email-aliases/> The documentation describing what the aliases are supposed to contain will be reachable from any of those pages in an upcoming release, and we will be looking for other places to put it to make it easy to find. We are also continuing to work on improving the issues that started the threads sharing the Subject of this message at a high priority. RjS On 3/6/15 9:18 AM, George, Wes wrote: > While I'm poking dead threads... What's the ETA for these pages? Info > still isn't present at the URL below, which sounded like was something the > secretariat should be able to do independent of the next datatracker > release schedule. > > Thanks, > > Wes > > > > On 2/11/15, 12:24 PM, "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> On 2015-02-11 18:11, Dave Crocker wrote: >>> On 2/11/2015 8:52 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >>>> The aliases that are created currently are as follows (except that >>>> aliases that have empty expansions are not created): >>> ... >>> >>> >>> Besides the email you just sent, where is this documented? >> We're working on both help pages for the aliases with this information, >> and pages that will let your search/inspect the generated aliases. They >> will be part of the next datatracker release. >> >>> A newbie should be able to easily learn of these addresses and where >>> they go. >>> >>> At a minimum, I suggest replicated the relevant parts of the text you >>> just sent on the page: >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/id-info/ >> Sound reasonable, I guess. I'll Bcc the secretariat on this email. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Henrik >> > > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
- Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise lev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… John C Klensin
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Pete Resnick
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Eggert, Lars
- RE: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… t.p.
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Lou Berger
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… t.p.
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Jari Arkko
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Dave Crocker
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… George, Wes
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… George, Wes
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… George, Wes
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks