Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Fri, 09 July 2010 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141713A6A17 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nn3ZaRlvWQVQ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C243F3A6A94 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.227] (c-98-234-104-156.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.104.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o69FGFGZ093361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:16:16 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
References: <7022DEA1-7FC0-4D77-88CE-FA3788720B43@cdt.org> <47076F01-CC4C-45E6-803E-8E2516BE15AC@gmail.com> <20100709113224.123900@gmx.net> <m2tyo8hneu.wl%randy@psg.com> <20100709121550.123890@gmx.net> <m2r5jchm9w.wl%randy@psg.com> <20100709143944.107930@gmx.net>
Message-Id: <9B27E780-88F7-498A-94F3-A858056F84FD@bogus.com>
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100709143944.107930@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (7B367)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 7B367)
Subject: Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:16:36 -0700
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:16:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:16:19 -0000

With all due respect the geopriv held experiment at ietf71 could have been done anywhere, and had no impact on participants who were not involved in them.

I have zero interest in building process that might impede the activity of people conducting protocol experiments that occur effectively in isolation.

Joel's iPad

On Jul 9, 2010, at 7:39 AM, "Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

> Randy, 
> 
> this privacy policy effort is not a means to put someone in the spotlight because a mistake has been made. 
> 
> I think it is good that we do all sorts of experiments with the IETF network and use it for research purposes. 
> 
> Still, if someone wants to do their tests then they should do it in an open and transparent fashion and tell people what they do. The writeup should then contain information like
> * what data is collected
> * what is the purpose
> * how long is it stored
> * how is responsible 
> * how does the opt-in procedure work
> 
> It would also be nice to hear the results of the effort afterwards as well. 
> 
> Without listing other persons efforts I would like to mention the location server experiment a few of us did from the GEOPRIV working group. I don't recall anymore how we announced it and what we said in our announcement (it was a few years ago already) but a document like the one written by Alissa would have helped us. Richard Barnes might remember the details.  
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:28:43 +0900
>> Von: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
>> An: "Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
>> CC: ietf@ietf.org
>> Betreff: Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
> 
>>>>> And "yes" we have researchers looking into the traffic, people storing
>>>>> all sorts of data, etc.
>>>> 
>>>> we do?  about our traffic on the ietf meeting network?  stuff other
>> than
>>>> the _ephemeral_ data the noc ops use to manage the network?
>>> 
>>> Yes, the IETF meeting network. 
>> 
>> cites, please.
> 
> Remember the discussion about the RFID experiment, the location server experiment, 
>> 
>>>>  o there is no plan known by the net ops to do so in maastricht or
>>>>    beijing at either of those meetings.
>>> 
>>> I don't know. There is no central place where I could lookup any of
>>> this info. 
>> 
>> but you suspect the worst?  i am on the noc ops team.  you can trust my
>> statement or not.
> 
> I don't suspect anything. I believe it is good if people use the network for all sorts of tests, if they tell us what they do. 
> 
> 
>> 
>>>>  o aside from issues in the wireless deployment, the data about net
>> use
>>>>    at ietf meeings seems pretty boring to me from a research view
>>> 
>>> Maybe boring for you. 
>>> Some consider it a very large WLAN network, some others test their
>>> favorite tunneling technology with it, etc.
>> 
>> that is not gathering data on others' use of the network.
>> 
>> randy
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>