Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft
Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 13 August 2010 00:56 UTC
Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A4E3A6842 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.268
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.268 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.169, BAYES_00=-2.599, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8V1IsibeS6b9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0890E3A6A6C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvg7 with SMTP id 7so735350pvg.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type:subject :date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=YUWBCqxRNAEYF2IlTQ8amBdRUILpXEB2JSHtMoAqih0=; b=T7a2EG6zPAStsN6AVxuxZjWI5LEAJL3M3hwc2fLT5BS5Z63FOYqIgR44Tc0SR2x/h5 1So+dh+vzO0wkDuiNKs2e7eC6h/JJzTAhEiaiqcdGORGYH8Zy9B1SdoAgFKaUOWnNJCM OBVsK1+tCQDuVOX4GGB38evI6w63t29XeWInE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version :x-mailer; b=eP4DvYyxdw3SZcUEENSj6a5SFZ4x0E+zI6Wwcq9/KH+qEf5Zl5snkl/XZEvLKje1iY egfVshI0p0ZC3Rwk0E3k382c8JakRVPY2YOF3Q6BmypQolQot9rS9STblSuEJgeIV2G+ 20WyQ3IA1G1Ch/xC4BbqrB+Wz/2ycscaVMIWs=
Received: by 10.142.147.7 with SMTP id u7mr703461wfd.216.1281661011221; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.224.217] ([209.97.127.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q27sm2255280wfc.18.2010.08.12.17.56.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail-24-558611084"
Subject: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:56:45 -0700
Message-Id: <3D5CA93C-1A93-4AEA-B679-C15E6FCBC26D@gmail.com>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:56:15 -0000
The IAOC solicits feedback on the revised Administrative Procedures draft that is attached. An early draft was sent to the community for comment on 28 May 2010. Many comments received were about how this relates to BCP101, if the IAOC was changing BCP101, creating new rules, or clarifying areas where BCP101 was not clear. The attached draft should clarify these comments. In most cases, it includes the relevant BCP101 text and then describes how the IAOC is implementing this. There are a few cases where BCP101 does not provide specific guidance. In these cases the Administrative Procedures describes what the IAOC is doing as BCP101 requires. The first paragraph of the Administrative Procedures states: RFC 4071 (BCP 101) is the governing authority for IASA, the IAOC and the IAD. It contains clear direction and guidance, but not all the details required for the day-to-day operation of the IETF Administrative Support Activity. BCP 101 section 3.4 specifically tasks the IAOC to decide the details about its decision-making rules and making them public. These Procedures are in response to that requirement, and are further intended to provide clarity for the IAOC and IAD in the execution of operational responsibilities. Further, these procedures are not intended to change BCP 101; that would require another BCP in accordance with section 2.4. We hope this version resolves the concerns raised about the earlier version. Bob Hinden IAOC Chair p.s. I will be on vacation starting next week and will respond to comments when I return.
- Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Adrian Farrel
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Adrian Farrel
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Steve Crocker
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Dave CROCKER