RE: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Sat, 15 December 2007 15:00 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3YUm-0002wN-5Q; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:00:04 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3YUk-0002wI-W0 for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:00:03 -0500
Received: from hlid.ogud.com ([66.92.146.160] helo=ogud.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3YUk-0004f3-HQ for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:00:02 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (hlid.ogud.com [66.92.146.160]) by ogud.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lBFExswQ083675; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:59:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240801c3899a479d0b@[192.168.1.101]>
In-Reply-To: <AFE0AC8DCDE68842B94E8EC69D5F21D6330AD0F100@NA-EXMSG-W602.wingroup.windepl oy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <E1J3IFS-0002yV-CG@ietf.org> <20071214220518.GA14379@sources.org> <47631201.1070303@bogus.com> <p06240806c388d88dc9de@[165.227.249.204]> <a06240800c388daca0917@[192.168.1.101]> <AFE0AC8DCDE68842B94E8EC69D5F21D6330AD0F100@NA-EXMSG-W602.wingroup.windepl oy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:55:18 -0500
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 66.92.146.160
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Cc: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Subject: RE: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

At 22:58 -0800 12/14/07, Christian Huitema wrote:
>>  >Maybe reports of "the DNS is broken when you do go to pure IPv6" are
>>  >more valuable than "you can only go to IPv6 if you jump through these
>>  >hoops that only advanced Internet users can do".
>>
>>  Is the IETF afraid to eat it's own food?
>>  Or is it willing to do what's necessary (in the interim) to adjust to
>>  the new cuisine?
>
>Our networking team at Microsoft did run an "IPv6 only" trial during
>the development of Windows Vista. Volunteers only. The volunteers would
>disable the IPv4 stacks on their PC, and then attempt to go on with their
>normal work, both for internal applications such as corporate mail, file
>servers, or intranet servers, and for external applications, mostly web
>based. It worked, but it had to rely on a set of transport proxies for those
>internal applications that were not yet IPv6 ready, and of course web proxies
>for internal access.

(keeping with my food-based theme)

Learning from others' taste testing is good.  But it's better to 
taste it "your=IETF"self. ;)

As someone else said - I bet these were willing volunteers.
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Think glocally.  Act confused.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf