Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Tue, 08 March 2016 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF4812DB4A; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 14:06:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G_V5Pp2kSNjW; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 14:06:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBF5812DB67; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 14:06:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n186so152203230wmn.1; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 14:06:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:thread-index :content-language; bh=DA/3gvbksK6ccablTP77KrVlAqS4UWszMwN6eRzy2QA=; b=RCxJVuBCGLYFUiPl5+zsPRGHNln06ZkjfwTvnERq/T1vuIsdKTkS4xe5I5W/5zVQlj x8uNEKsuIvIJ39hH8OYhAoS5/Crl44k7uXjKKqlVNqTsnujPcrU3VSql3D7XzwX8VUgI EOPedJ2OvHNHASsUIrE3Wr7UP//IKoi9qxA+IAZCEj0Cbj0hu2nIWDtkwiQdlqFIMJV2 3MzyDmon8R4hDMt7Oelm3rRE4KW9LYmKwFKFAd3ioI8ySxA9j7tuQ9dEDHVY8W5pdxuJ xCeSpHF7LeuqDRf6o47/uCGiPihYmGfzxQ0HRJWb75DuUJCFSMVphV96EypT1JNWkBE3 7+WA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :thread-index:content-language; bh=DA/3gvbksK6ccablTP77KrVlAqS4UWszMwN6eRzy2QA=; b=AwDP6Pi8rcB6TU4wZfCDgYqL/GovHLzy/nRq+UzGrB26p1bFNRRE80cPJkzlRLeJlO D/4AI7ivaAmISYvtjzXwUGZQnJpqfU3r6/bwH/f4HbhPf/2xXY8zwMEQY7uoxzMBkpe1 zmdEfL1NiWfdQFXgwJe6SL16s8qYRPJ6pj4dqrGZSgrLBoVyiNOsUblzpS7Qq7xfIYAZ k05PGBA5TvhHFstu48u7cFzZYwP/BsTKynJ8VPlPsGLHs6QlbQFQeglIc2EXX6fG6dCb p4dwcezkJwSG4wxeutN5hBXSaVw0vqdkwZoZqcZuJldpQ7PJYYp7xlhFzcWqKXevZUjb d7WQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJVCB3hTarToCAqek8/Jv5BJDbI0W+8WKFnDAdCy4rgKqVZD/8KIredJUajTUCtAw==
X-Received: by 10.28.232.87 with SMTP id f84mr1973748wmh.56.1457474778147; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 14:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from RoniPC (bzq-79-182-56-247.red.bezeqint.net. [79.182.56.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p191sm30373420wmb.0.2016.03.08.14.06.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Mar 2016 14:06:17 -0800 (PST)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: <draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:06:13 +0200
Message-ID: <12bc01d17986$bba33930$32e9ab90$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_12BD_01D17997.7F2CCC80"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdF5hrpWN+fAb+exTzSUgFNKaxB9ng==
Content-Language: he
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rua8ngT0YvmP8DFAvvsBViJ7p_Y>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 22:06:31 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2016-3-8

IETF LC End Date: 2016-3-9

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP RFC.

 

 

 

Major issues:

 

 

Minor issues:

 

Nits/editorial comments:

Small question: In section 6 last bullet "While [RFC3633] assumes that the
DHCPv6 client is a router, DHCPv6 PD itself does not require that the client
forward IPv6 packets not addressed to itself, and thus does not require that
the client be an IPv6 router as defined in [RFC2460]."

Is this a good practice to recommend?

Also I understand that in the here the recommendation is that all IPv6
packets will be addressed to the DHCPv6 client (not a router) and this is
why he will not forward them.