IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv10.

Emily Shepherd <emily@emilyshepherd.me> Fri, 11 November 2016 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <emily@emilyshepherd.me>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95C2129671; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 06:51:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=emilyshepherd.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLzjDsSb3oq1; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 06:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lucy.sweeb.net (lucy.sweeb.net [139.162.207.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CC201299BA; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 06:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lucy.sweeb.net (Postfix, from userid 115) id DB9A6220E9; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:51:26 +0000 (GMT)
Authentication-Results: lucy.sweeb.net; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; unprotected key" header.d=emilyshepherd.me header.i=@emilyshepherd.me header.b=Cpai4vW1; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from emily-tablet (host81-157-242-148.range81-157.btcentralplus.com [81.157.242.148]) by lucy.sweeb.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44A5B220E6; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:51:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=emilyshepherd.me; s=mail; t=1478875886; bh=Xaxp3sMOhfSJjWWPoWbZLg8jif63nnhx1Lm6VsmdFfE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Cpai4vW1vbOQKVJ/5ArEGFFIbfN2d0Nn82U7QSCFMQgAUC2KYLvw0CnjQytK4Di9M A6l130zszn3uKB+d0FdtQ6f+M2j91VfGQpon1GkUKAoMKxZRMs3ytXIQsIMOj31x0q 5zeu0M0PMLT9ql9x6gjvX39QJOHk7clh9WbRwjQQ=
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:51:24 +0000
From: Emily Shepherd <emily@emilyshepherd.me>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv10.
Message-ID: <20161111145124.rqqecqquea7ckj7s@emily-tablet>
References: <HE1PR04MB14495F52AADAED56D5F75C4EBDBB0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="of2avqo5bqroogcr"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR04MB14495F52AADAED56D5F75C4EBDBB0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rui_U5Ftai27xH21Tsmf2Zrq-7I>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:51:30 -0000

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:38:34PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote:
>You can find the latest version of the IPv10 draft attached in this e-mail.

This looks fairly similar to just using a IPv4-mapped IPv6 address 
within an IPv6 packet [RFC4038]; is there a nuance I'm missing here?

Emily

[RFC4038] Shin, M-K., Ed., Hong, Y-G., Hagino, J., Savola, P., and
          E. Castro, "Application Aspects of IPv6 Transition",
          RFC 4038, DOI 10.17487/RFC4038, March 2005,
          <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4038>.

-- 
Emily Shepherd
Computer Science Graduate, MEng (Hons)
W: https://emilyshepherd.me/
M: +44(0)7575 721 231

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email