Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:09:22 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: scott bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, leslie@thinkingcat.com
Message-ID: <4FCF49BF20304535081422DE@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <20040908001054.B183D7E76F@newdev.harvard.edu>
References: <20040908001054.B183D7E76F@newdev.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report
Precedence: list
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



--On tirsdag, september 07, 2004 20:10:54 -0400 scott bradner 
<sob@harvard.edu> wrote:

> leslie sez:
>> In my reading of Scenarios A & B, the suggestion
>> is that ISOC takes on the administrative work more-or-less
>> directly.
>
> takes on" the admin work or "contracts vendors" to do the admin work
>


takes on the admin work of contracting vendors to do the real work.

at least that's my understanding of what makes sense.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf