IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom procedures revision

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 01 September 2015 05:55 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A501B8286 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K8nYwSH2UmTN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D009F1B8284 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pacgr6 with SMTP id gr6so13849269pac.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VLKQpyVHuXfVDVthhPAbksJXPkiHgox5aULmSpyBVt8=; b=SLqKXGqmjo1/TMGgZDAlqQm2xhnRwfwddQtbqq6uYJ4D+xVBQxuinyEHAiJfcwOQFi 2Ffbce0XwwkWlLKPL5180X2/5PKLka0wgZmDYeKYhe6ubPZPqELwQOAQWiIUgpm2sNM4 l6qrEgobQohNnjacPUglPYaYee+DFOOrkpOD6jbbyAA76haUNSEDVm4YMNn2ZxmMD0MW DLtt4G3sU8GnfPbPQC6G2PN0L6TiUorVHM4EoVFua1cuBT5Ts8VkDWToTapQ9eUOIFHh xtawSO+xAC4a7l6/61xBlycqTbEWVXIvN080JMV7DKcJR/Gg+cPw0w5fjLCq4N2v4RCU /ujQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.252.131 with SMTP id zs3mr42723844pac.75.1441086918472; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-36-121-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.36.121]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y8sm16602164pbt.7.2015.08.31.22.55.17 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55E53DC3.3040600@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 21:55:15 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom procedures revision
References: <CAL0qLwYJzFZT=OgWqiiTw-n6mvb3PPusRtArmPs_d4_qpLfmpg@mail.gmail.com> <55E0D5E5.6030802@gmail.com> <55E1714C.6070602@pi.nu> <55E21442.3030008@gmail.com> <46DC3DDD2AB9558580D99D5B@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAL0qLwagsUcPVEOakDkNyB65RPjHwW33kONH_QGfSyxcoeP6fQ@mail.gmail.com> <55E537C4.8050302@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55E537C4.8050302@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/s27m8dUkaKSZowqSDmUi-o6buqk>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 05:55:19 -0000

On 8/31/15 9:29 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> My suggestion was the first one: publish what you have now, then try
> the experiment. Experiments can fail.

I think this is a terrific suggestion.  It seems to me to
be a reasonable way to try to build a better nomcom, but
I think it's also potentially got something interesting to
teach us about overall IETF process and whether or not we
can relax some of our more rigid processes at our current
scale.  I'd like to see us give this a try.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email