IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: BCP97bis

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 18 October 2021 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144FD3A0522 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GaMpkzUs3ILu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92a.google.com (mail-ua1-x92a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 736FF3A0029 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92a.google.com with SMTP id e10so8076731uab.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Bu88hi5D916GHPv8O1oK6rs53ZAfmcJqdfipdeVuGIE=; b=THf9Pvp76MXPJNZd5q/EwaaHedqhdKSie0zW+sIfmb7YPhelZwDUYY9djMbfe7YH2h nurcefimCV99hc5j34mwZna05slsPlckuQwFOdt8pTNwWe+G/RzTH/T6U3DC5c2QdShY GdrA/S3A2P1lc1BJ1IqKrxV8FUWZmgQ+pp0Mm0FJlwTYyjN2mN4hYwGBPK8etnCpXkLN TCn5J9VGJj5CTMY/3QVfa89umUWUnI8JuQMsrv2GDTETx2HKGO3HQVLRlCvgD7UICvtH hQujfXiaWzfM1yLCh/rHd+lSaM7CtkwAqp0azYvRVnaGB7PPfwn3bPVdotoQKZrYxrom UsYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Bu88hi5D916GHPv8O1oK6rs53ZAfmcJqdfipdeVuGIE=; b=klIJ2rgcYziYXJUJ4PGkp8QZ7046SPTRKRUe9l+WanpdpTtbaF9BxzlexxUaYhKP/l gYW6etF16HYz+IpDynSZqFQEYJ+o+pT8TEf4FGyV1371DT4mCtqiU3++cZsh2rmHhS66 CAKfMgGkegBq9E3REg/m4I2JSuV/2R81F+9ro52MEkQPzBZct0smc5YzH52MRlyT9tbU sFwH2Fev3fYgpaKuAYG8nZkXXsG7LNdL99ymM0xMtbglaQvoPl9XCE0gcscPQi2+NL6p NwVQu9fvzI80duwhrkzqd+j30wfOFw4kUll/JGhxkpI3Wa50SyoQjIcxq4ePquGtJ1Ij v9Og==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DJyC1DJPdyvBsYsVg5hjketJ8TS2vT5Z+S00l9zpTkhm9z7KI AKwSXtfuemUn8QmuFV9BkQZONwvclFwlAvNhCC4nYA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/F6/glMaZzb+SJ0S1GbnwtwQb/QiWQlf8Y+bbEeEjSkSulsG8D0hJc1TcN3p0/RQufnh3gCpg0+qTQMbySv8=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6034:: with SMTP id n20mr3162406ual.21.1634584934020; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbwvs2Cp_urgJ=hzc6yEMGDaz3C0xf6RQXRrB89wAx=Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwavK5dYdmYPVxdMT5rA=jBZv1cEyAsVBEWOD7p9MoZR1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwa4ChOsuMkmoP_sAGv3Wn2AcSz1OkijmxZzP+MGvnwviA@mail.gmail.com> <849D7F9E-8AD4-4CE8-A66C-358FB1F2E6AE@tzi.org> <3AC61568-DBDC-4ADB-9935-9C53333AE7E2@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZvCq7R=WBFsrwf51CKSN8ur0Yj-F=VOHnP=hQD0ooj-A@mail.gmail.com> <890A4965-D847-4606-849C-A0C8D8FD3B0C@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZtBiuh5n3U_pKma1s4ymPOCy7CY0pFaaacx6NDYNu5AQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iKkm1C2BwTfSu35WQbzNYSvBAGJiDVh6kh7zYDjp4rofw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZasyxM++xa7kRm8+GWbjxXC+YGLMVLbxwu_925uCGa7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZasyxM++xa7kRm8+GWbjxXC+YGLMVLbxwu_925uCGa7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:21:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+4DOqknHhpk7q+zksheGjCeHqisCEG9ZwNf693LkAD8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BCP97bis
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000590bc305cea576d5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/s5Bzl7_2V51n9SoKU-mTLC4rivE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:22:25 -0000

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 2:01 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:40 AM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
>> Yes, in an ideal world, this would be an open, free, etc document -- but,
>> absent an ideal world, I still think that it's better that how IPv6 is
>> transmitted over NFC using 6LoWPAN is documented in an RFC than having an
>> undocumented protocol...
>>
>
> I agree, but we're not talking here about making that a hard requirement.
> We just need to ensure meaningful reviews are possible when that's not the
> case.
>

Yup, acknowledged -- I was just trying to provide some background / explain
why sometimes we need to escape valve.
W


>
> -MSK
>


-- 
The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the
complexities of his own making.
  -- E. W. Dijkstra

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status