Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1C83A07A1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 06:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kINMN9KlTzvP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 06:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CA9D3A0781 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 06:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id d14so8403298ilq.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 06:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PV4PmVKmxF0PF7cpPzuN0u6a/B1Aol/izw924V0CGlM=; b=LzGlTzfv3fmaNWd8BfLhFt1nc1SlPJoHZz4uMm1uDWsCtUcmH6IqnXyubWMXe4gK8I tbP/Ld3xSo0n4puVMDny8OHh/LEST4TLJHsL9mZ2JFxk+lf83CcAcukk/CwgIlSluifI mvrnDdNb5sK7F0EfoOdTdQC3OXJcMl+eNizaEyJs8/fBFIKnH0ySeflVUPPicfjuUVhx Vu08T5jrr/JJcWIZB9py98BrqT/Uac6/2VjVW5985aIHT8RVe64TmY+uJp6zMCv2LO0B SY10wdleIEMWzVrwtIr1UCki7o8c6JfmKpKRUlHYYF6u9aXoUrbeMDrjm6Mf6FaFPpwW E9Vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PV4PmVKmxF0PF7cpPzuN0u6a/B1Aol/izw924V0CGlM=; b=HpqjkmvlK0jaK7IJuqMv/ynhD1nb54usKw/d3cojvdRim3LkrXZirf5VRuso0AmjCP /WwZ9oJbK3GLcS4ZC1ZIBFOcrDA+/uW/CY0ds2pUZ1FXFkNFC9tOSw/7zXZLyYV87nXW jC1aTDtfI4XdmsdrqZ1qVO6mVkktNF+coE5QkfUAUJmrJTk2ohf/t4LYSask+pdcW272 pRxfz/h08Z018s750DIK7p+iLW2J7TerU5VMhJyYvAaMR4x+H1E7GKZHTa4/qiYxFYIG WWs17/XnhiRAf85bNpRbbzFvPAgF9VRoOzzAfVVLxnWQwFeKBUxy4ILr3y+EJhJsqGx2 7s1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0TqYCI6QDM3C+Xbg3OHup/w28K9IFoc3B7T4KzXwXThRp7Suh1 dFlzYoOhCT3bYPCQ2afhGXGm73aEPZJlf/nobhpIyg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vutk6RKBPkO5q66I1S2P94A9o2rxUjh2ul8WjFV?= =?utf-8?q?1r2YNJeLa+Ohhx+vrriMiyuDGwTNEsnjOzegSTxxWKObeS8=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:8659:: with SMTP id g86mr10330963ild.96.1584107523733; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 06:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <EC8024D5-B1D7-4DCD-862D-88167A7C00BF@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <EC8024D5-B1D7-4DCD-862D-88167A7C00BF@eggert.org>
From: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:52:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CABmDk8=LbkaT7US+cxB3x=t1i8BYz84bnzEKw6c_uxQ8vG2Q2w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003cfe0f05a0bcc68d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/s6heSOyKSedZ0FiEf2_Z2FP-7_I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:52:13 -0000

+1

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:51 AM Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 2020-3-13, at 15:43, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> > For convenient reference, the current rules for an IETF participant to
> > be eligible to be a voting member of a NomCom (Section 4.14 of RFC
> > 8713) require attendance in person at three of the last five meetings.
> ....
> > The IESG would like the community’s input: How do *you* think 107
> > should be treated in regards to NomCom eligibility?
> ....
> > One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom
> > eligibility.
>
> since we canceled 107, ignoring it (as you outline above) seems the
> obvious approach? I might be missing something, but I don't understand how
> that is not the obvious answer.
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
>