Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satisfaction survey for the RFC Production Center and Publisher

Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org> Wed, 16 January 2019 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2080E130E99 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:49:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=aegee.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GmBgXgkPS4_L for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.aegee.org (mail.aegee.org [144.76.142.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B32DB130E8E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x0GInOY1020509; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=didopalauzov
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aegee.org; s=k4096; t=1547664570; i=dkim+MSA-tls@aegee.org; r=y; bh=FeA2l+9Vbj0NGzQg5jnSA9wp1g0jQav17EVWhnZg+AI=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=hgCoBIp0G/l3O3/ohupLviUzraXQSVLQw+/rMCMU3tluf/IjmDeLiqGeNbpjsrfcA QYV/kZW7TSIeQjO50g3PWtKqn4bCu4TsL0YGrPGNkj8q5tNe3PHOQrEpKJJmPIgc2k OW0mH+RJb3EUIHEhrhoF0MserlwvGd0isEjPp9ME9fBYlWN6UjIuH7kWHMjmwngnO8 AHYj0GW3f0I538kj8fyQtItzlH0zYK2iKEAtFvngqp2ikHnK5Whm0A7kHjfvXKZ+9c X7YjABHtRyDxuJ0rZo21Tl0Z20xyNntDNYmAgVh54MlaCtWKxd+EXkqg5M1GH1hKf5 717s5gByEBVJjI0wt75EWUG9XjAEdYo8UlyF+TfgzpvGV6S4KgiW0k3ElM5axrSq26 tw3IcmB/V/kClAsPSOoaZUODmqRr7eafLVOoyt3+yMb2yVzs/IG1n02GRAn84CtYi5 NSKlsFmgupm40vgtRWafV8irNuyr6CgAURjzMuq5rpOJMTG7gv1X3UtpQL72kJ1B20 NAmgdPpRtJPjA5VI6LmArGSvxnV80FL7IWrE0dY6M5ypYw3sGd2PXxg3W25qyOj+H0 +MTXlKIUrKOSMmwMx51LCvMBGoZ8f/tGpl/TYY/uVtZqWU/67f0eL2eIIlwXAxDsEX XIYpOG/7amvlL5hSTkVvCwm8=
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x0GInOY1020509; dkim=none
Received: from Tylan (adsl-62-167-97-198.adslplus.ch [62.167.97.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.aegee.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0GInOY1020509 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jan 2019 18:49:24 GMT
Message-ID: <00671997ca4be0f943e0fead273c872332fed67e.camel@aegee.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satisfaction survey for the RFC Production Center and Publisher
From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2?= <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
To: Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 18:49:23 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1a60f985-eba4-de04-6750-0a4cc9895652@rfc-editor.org>
References: <1a60f985-eba4-de04-6750-0a4cc9895652@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.31.90
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.1 at mail.aegee.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/s8x-K7rjrVUKCWewDzH2ByUDwxI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 18:49:37 -0000

Hello,

> What one thing would make the editing process easier or more effective? [Free form text]
> 


Post publication editing:

I joined this mailing list proposing integrating the validated errata in the RFCs, without necessary creating a separate
RFC with distinct number for the update.

The idea is that readers can just pick a document (RFC), read it and don’t struggle with fixed misconsistencies in the
document, already clarified in the errata.

Regards
  Дилян