Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-09

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sun, 07 May 2017 04:24 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841D5127A91 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2017 21:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 190_98kOH2dx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2017 21:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0524D126557 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 May 2017 21:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id x71so15257023vkd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 May 2017 21:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8n74Wh9cNR+RnxLuohWUbePE5/m6zlfN7EpeFZfshAQ=; b=1fduc9cg8bZQqIeMDOf2QMGxC+ifFZCY1EghUmsCeMCThKIDG3cDC/xzLSvJ/cIfT3 K2Zd0H3yAxHT8W5hg0hiMA6g8OJ2hXvVXNqmvfg7t13wphn3qxxp8iDfp0xE/2LnKZ53 EuPaiSR8iGxZuhiXPGxpeenyyll8y4fjsEBeZqwNTa4lv8h8bKQrmzZ3y4b6bEidE4s7 MrFxBARCRY2s0N3q9BpHM3JXLmThRhGdY/M+TYM3RaTst3Z7rnwsSOQyPFj3+PHgbQrY jQePrqwGDVUMS2ifTnP3DVo4tMXXvLOh8I9HWgA+zF5/Qbl6F4oqbOaXScXka5hHamXj wtsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8n74Wh9cNR+RnxLuohWUbePE5/m6zlfN7EpeFZfshAQ=; b=Td3i9NkcLduPS+Tp811yYzlAzoN14mLS6B6XgK7DxRg061YDOz/LHRQn8dtU8GPX35 m2QE+cgzZuakGMpQ3/sq/qrXzr07tMmjJjkBV96Ey+olFTWxbW6Zo9F+RK/8q8IwE5AG 74ixo05Ig1OTp0A41yvLPOXrZ56VrW3ByQ2TPXWLLon5FIIWPmnvobti+vDcxQilZvvs x6KsGaL00KD39rfpzsjabKaa2I22zZwaeIxYNoZom2o39IA+0NiIB8vMmSlZhVu7CtNE yWbL6GfSHhBLqBZxwhct8leKdhAe6dWfxLTNPH3EYL032bCiK0WvLXiFzbl2/jAH8qNK dxYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDDX4fLo/sW+mBzgs1ldE61e1Crcq0e3FjO3V2SRoz20okix4ff 3AKN+RIW7MVsA1GHrQA4I3zctRetXCd2
X-Received: by 10.31.136.10 with SMTP id k10mr4658470vkd.51.1494131066897; Sat, 06 May 2017 21:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <149360667193.9876.7534874775326889081@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149360667193.9876.7534874775326889081@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 04:24:15 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+4+fUZ4WVJLGv103nzvuFdugpN0gks7CcYgyKGyrSinA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-09
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114517cc7d9d69054ee77f9d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sC-GoMIUpI8d1XxUTBI2H5G4YKA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 04:24:31 -0000

Good catch -- these were included in the IETF Last Call notice, and there
was discussion with the chairs and responsible AD. They will be noted in
the downref registry; however, the write-up should have included a mention
of this. I've CCed the chairs / will ask the AD to update the write-up for
completeness...

W



On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 4:44 AM Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-09
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2017-04-30
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-27
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-05-25
>
> Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as a Proposed
> Standard RFC
>
> Major issues:
>     Procedural - ID Nits notes that there are normative references to
> RFCs 7129 and 7719.  Those are informational RFCs.  The shepherd
> writeup does not note these downrefs.  (I see this was also noted by
> Jouni Korhonen, but I do not see a resolution.)
>
> Minor issues:
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
>
>