IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Wed, 28 November 2012 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BDE21F8570 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:42:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGePjvq9m4nn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:42:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C6921F8565 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.147]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qASCgIPI024487; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:42:19 +0200
X-CheckPoint: {50B606BF-0-1B221DC2-2FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.194]) by IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.194]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:41:15 +0200
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"
Thread-Topic: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"
Thread-Index: AQHNzMkvuHQpFei0akq/z4gI6x0ECJf+Lq8AgADVOgCAAAw9AA==
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:41:14 +0000
Message-ID: <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC30277210245BE@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <20121127231404.GC1941@verdi> <m2mwy26iud.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2mwy26iud.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.24]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <048C92421B8F114E8091E79382AF92DD@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, John Leslie <john@jlc.net>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:42:34 -0000

On Nov 28, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

>> I'm increasingly seeing a "paradigm" where the review happens _before_
>> adoption as a WG draft.
> 
> and one consequence is that the design gets done outside of the ietf
> process.

+1

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email