IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement: Support Documents in IETF Working Groups

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 16 November 2016 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AF512967F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 01:12:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cxjwgRisaPdx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 01:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6942C12954E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 01:12:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAG9CNqJ021719; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:12:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from t2001067c037001285422d7b68adf748f.v6.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:5422:d7b6:8adf:748f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3tJdnL0pr0z7yS6; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:12:21 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Subject: Re: IESG Statement: Support Documents in IETF Working Groups
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161108234440.18541.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:12:15 +0900
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 500980334.929385-7e300e809d9a2c8104fc708e78f6b53e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7065715E-CF92-4072-873A-2BA7582B65BB@tzi.org>
References: <20161108234440.18541.qmail@ary.lan>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sHp8c1gkWEi1K2Olnz11c_pyMr8>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:12:27 -0000

On 9 Nov 2016, at 08:44, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> the waterfall development
> model, which was demolished in The Mythical Man Month over 40 years
> ago.

(Actually, it was introduced in a paper in 1970 that already explained why it doesn’t work very well.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email