Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP

Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Tue, 06 November 2007 19:21 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpTzG-0000h3-SE; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:21:22 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpTzF-0000go-AY for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:21:21 -0500
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpTzF-0000RF-2n for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:21:21 -0500
Received: from bright.research.att.com (bright.research.att.com [135.207.20.189]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828ED147FA4; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:21:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by bright.research.att.com (8.13.1/8.12.10/Submit) id lA6JLChe003272; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:21:12 -0500
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Message-Id: <200711061921.lA6JLChe003272@bright.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
To: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:21:12 -0400
Versions: dmail (linux) 2.7/makemail 2.14
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

>For example, see:
>http://kerneltrap.org/node/2873

That message appears to be based completely on conjecture - for
example, their assertion based on looking at the list of assigned
numbers ignores the fact that all of the numbers they based their
supposition on were assigned before the rules were put in place.

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf