IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call on draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Tue, 01 February 2011 06:13 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A683A692C for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:13:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.206
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.393, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id phfOAEMy-iM9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2345F3A687B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so7037940fxm.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:16:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lgmjaXqlPwjKAvze7cA7MtAos9+LBOXordASsWJbQyA=; b=KPJyajsKQTjCU726t+1CjX7vp0VpgCIn55QyYpESkO7jIYNSlR/GJ+eDWyrKfrfgVG BZuUxcuhNKmWt3t6Jfy9VTnl0WgewD+2xbuXVg9SBuPfuLCdsl9f/MgWp82J8k68yRay abIvSJNWt4lEUXYKTic+PcXLnxUuOjhYf9i54=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EvCaM1x/qOmfe65zeX51PyuZIZd1jDBAiA8Ab+SsiKWcguWTIHGq1UMXKF2nGOuyZt 6RqW8LbHbVR/rfDWqXvEeaq3URAy2ZZrGVqAj1q1NNruPMgd2dqzsxDuRFo8N/hAD+rS 9tYlc/byOfrBAsCWmZjbWsOHe7CRFGwG2/CBs=
Received: by 10.223.74.206 with SMTP id v14mr775167faj.66.1296540997718; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:16:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a2sm7679105faw.22.2011.01.31.22.16.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:16:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D47A55B.3030200@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:16:59 +0200
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call on draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt
References: <AANLkTin+wxG6oSrvux6DuqZNA1hLGALmozfxzhhGxT3+@mail.gmail.com> <4D471DAA.5080402@venaas.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D471DAA.5080402@venaas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: The IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:13:24 -0000

31.01.2011 22:38, Stig Venaas wrote:
> I have now submitted version 04 which I believe addresses the last
> call comments. The changes are as follows:
>
> Added the sentence:
> The message type is a 4-bit integer with possible values from 0 to 15.
>
> Listing 11-14 as Unassigned.
Stig,

Thank you very much for your changes.  Now the registry definition seems 
to be clear.

>
> The references are now all Informational (there was a down reference
> to experimental).
Maybe RFC 5226 should be referenced normatively, as well as some docs. 
connected to PIMv2.  Moreover, the reference to IANA registry should read:

Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Registry, "IGMP Type 
Numbers", per RFC 3228, as for <registry update date, for this - 
November 2010>

All the best,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
>
> There was a comment about expanding the term PIM. PIM has now been
> added to the list of well-known abbreviations that don't need to be
> expanded. Hence I chose not to expand it.
>
> Stig
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email