Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here)

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 03 December 2012 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E12821F89E3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 20:33:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bx5uWagY175a for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 20:33:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDE421F89D7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 20:33:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (c-98-207-206-4.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.207.206.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB34XWhc013925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 04:33:33 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <50BC2B96.9040702@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:33:26 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:18.0) Gecko/20121128 Thunderbird/18.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here)
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <00c001cdce7a$d9fa6490$8def2db0$@asgard.org> <50B7EA5D.2030803@qti.qualcomm.com> <50BA18B8.3090306@network-heretics.com> <p06240609cce032de76ff@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <m2obidvuv7.wl%randy@psg.com> <p0624060ccce0b42ffc47@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <50BB10FF.6090105@gmail.com> <50BB5A69.40107@network-heretics.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121202073741.0ac80c68@resistor.net> <A1D3CE1A0AA345FE0ECB6697@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <50BB92FB.5040904@dcrocker.net> <50BB950A.9000408@network-heretics.com> <50BB9699.6070404@dcrocker.net> <50BB9888.8080906@network-heretics.com> <50BBA21D.6090403@bogus.com> <50BBA8C3.6040100@network-heretics.com> <50BBC0A4.3090305@bogus.com> <50BC1658.7070901@network-heretics!.com> <50BC1658.7070901@network-heretics.com> <50BC213B.8060602@bogus.com> <m2sj7niygz.wl%randy@psg.com> <50BC2504.1000206@bogus.com> <m2pq2rixpn.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2pq2rixpn.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:33:33 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:33:34 -0000

On 12/2/12 8:08 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> I'm unclear on how we'd carry on a discussion without a floor
>>>> management discipline.
>>> i know it's a leap, but maybe presume people are adults
>> and that everyone of them has a microphone
> so we build our meetings around the fears, will someone speak
> unacceptably, will someone appeal, will someone pass gas in
> class?  next we can have the tsa screen people at the door.
currently we don't do it that way (hand everyone a mic) because it's 
infeasable.  Oddly I have none of the above fears.
> can we please play the upside.  there is a high road, let's
> take it.

I thought I was. Mic discipline exists because, we have big rooms that require sound reinforcement, and remote participants and a recording. So if you're concerned about being heard, or hearing or the historical record, you should be in favor of it in general

I've never noted the existence of a mic line at an IETF precluding 
statements which I find disagreeable, so I have trouble imagining them 
being used for that purpose.
> randy
>