IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 01 April 2021 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D803A2297 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNdnG0VQijou for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB953A2292 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385B95C0053 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:37:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Apr 2021 16:37:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ujdlautigqgwqg+WVsGSJiCsKB/jZA85rt6kgH7j6 eU=; b=rdXNRpF8mbgf/HXzD3Mrpg6g58sSu0yoORC9uiCkzGpPj9AOUS/GJH1DK Y8SZ/zTMsIrWz4FUP2gZORAGcM0EycDOMH2/vys03kKrwPXm8ty6OPjmtTTGc4iH N7OlwArqGFvLbH8S44jSN/biPmN8y7xcPUpcEXDGyIiWt5d1vQL4T5We4EqvzzNJ mq95L15Gn5MZxX7WPiyBH3VQ5QSyjUgyvPb/1tpNDkbzv/uyRA8jyc8laytFT4Tz aV3ReoKGJVZY3navN9EQatXENmk9U0bW/duwDuRx6QX4DL9GasSL/oWI8Cwlf9dK QTno3/NI+jjowWvyP7qF5ZsrEr9jQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Ai9mYAJnKOJteX-tA72srar4pJT1smLPWlxFs92laj-Hh0617mB04w> <xme:Ai9mYALEjZEGTM7fCUONsey7M1RsG5v3GO4SZRg3vld3lt6UGoKnh2keLAtRd4x6- w9ShnrNWycvwg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeigedgudegvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesth ejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkedvgefgle euleekuefhffehgefhhfekuedvudduiefhhedufefftdfgtdekfffgnecukfhppeejfedr uddufedrudeiledriedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Ai9mYAuZrrwF996he5S7bo0kTOC2jar_nuz5VjTMOIWHRFxno8tvIQ> <xmx:Ai9mYNZ33hiCnw0IQvKYqZp02Fse7WbCBQ_joQcbynxtWIMkTlj7bw> <xmx:Ai9mYHYO77_sjt3tmC1NHl0oAxMYuaw-aXLGW13DffznY91K7zwjag> <xmx:Ay9mYPoJM1NFhpVC6FBfRmTbRnGsKaqUD740IMko933yEFAhw9G9_A>
Received: from [192.168.30.202] (c-73-113-169-61.hsd1.tn.comcast.net [73.113.169.61]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B082A24005C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:37:22 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <859352252.4167919.1617264911078.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <859352252.4167919.1617264911078@mail.yahoo.com> <85575541-C896-4530-B028-C0DF9BA3EA8B@ietf.org> <411426886.24320.1617306016731@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <4ea30864-3b74-4b3c-0d84-2cff8514569a@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 16:37:21 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <411426886.24320.1617306016731@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/skvpLSNag_D2FD6zrek-FR0RItc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 20:37:30 -0000

On 4/1/21 3:40 PM, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

> I am trying to make up my mind on this, so could you please clarify the following: what did you judge to be in violation of the code of conduct, the substance, the tone or the method (or all of them)?
>
> In other words: is holding or expressing the opinion that "ongoing efforts to make the IETF more accessible to all interested participants are somehow overblown, not useful, or Orwellian in nature" a violation of the code of conduct?
>
> Or is it the fact that this opinion was expressed through a (mildly) satyrical text, rather than straightforwardly?
>
> Or is it the fact that the text was posted through the Internet draft process?
>
> Thank you in advance for the clarification.

I would also like this to be clarified.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email