Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic

Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com> Mon, 21 March 2016 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <gregskinner0@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614D212DB80 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06Al-9SFaIDF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gds.best.vwh.net (gds.best.vwh.net [192.220.66.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4249412DB8D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 51684 invoked by uid 17031); 21 Mar 2016 21:18:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.100]) (gds@[198.144.201.12]) (envelope-sender <gregskinner0@icloud.com>) by 192.220.66.135 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for <ietf@ietf.org>; 21 Mar 2016 21:18:04 -0000
From: Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2D0C50BD-67CC-4BDB-8DCA-C6827926BDC9"
Message-Id: <8A0BEE90-2B70-4B41-A968-A8E4CE7824F6@icloud.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:18:03 -0700
References: <20160317191526.8948.67217.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20160317191526.8948.67217.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/smm-01Xw5zj1Rvkd5iuqAzKu0Rc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:18:09 -0000

If it is not too late, I would like to request that RFCs 1287, 1380, 1550, and 1752 also be moved to Historic.  1287, 1380, and 1752 are referenced in the draft (1550 is referenced from 1752), and concern the replacement of IPv4 with (what would eventually become) IPv6.

Please see the following link from the sunset4 WG for more information.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/dsUpNpJsZZt4IEfS4afJKOyExnU <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/dsUpNpJsZZt4IEfS4afJKOyExnU>

Greg

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 12:15 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org <mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
> Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document:
> - 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic'
>  <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org> mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org <mailto:iesg@ietf.org> instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/>
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
>