IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 11:06 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D773D21F9B58 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.116, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CsZe2Mh4kfhY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F5C11E8143 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1VYZml-0000vH-Tj; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:06:04 +0000
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:06:03 +0200
Message-ID: <m21u3d5zvo.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com>
References: <5262FB95.8080500@gmail.com> <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com> <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:06:11 -0000

> Personal opinion:
> 
> 1. We shouldn't tolerate anonymous postings in any case.
> 
> 2. ISOC salaries are utterly irrelevant to any IETF discussion.
>    It's just way out of line.

anonymity is sometimes useful

as the ietf is legally f(isoc), isoc salaries will be relevant to those
folk inclined to spend their tine on process, organization, and
omphaloskepsis.

and to judge by the message counts on this list, far more folk are
interested in process, organization, and omphaloskepsis than in
techhical subects.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email