IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Hotel situation

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 16 December 2015 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0BD1A6EEC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:55:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uivD1xWrzseK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:55:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E05E1A00FA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:54:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 16997 invoked by uid 0); 16 Dec 2015 17:54:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2015 17:54:48 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id uHuk1r00b2SSUrH01HunzX; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:54:47 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Zc6OaKlA c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=wUQvQvOEmiQA:10 a=qWeRdXDv7UHOGgLDB38A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=KZdVKCH+olGFCfTcuArMwrPkVUAhROMCRaweLimoFYI=; b=Dun1s/4VS3NoRmeTOCPTk9HH1HLmibO2jbLjOdSLuw2Jwo2vRa7f0Jb+m6Ia3RTCdDY/SQvziUp9uY0RTk6ga+nSaeEBjpCCm6WSe8u+bW/plLsv+/kqMCDS2p32Yz2j;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:47954 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1a9GHl-00056o-Gt; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:54:45 -0700
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <5671A55F.6090709@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:54:39 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/srXPZ52Wz_TaXGTMQOXJSFQo0fA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:55:01 -0000


On 12/16/2015 11:52 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> That said, I think you'd make a great candidate for the IAOC next time if you feel like trying to disprove this point!   :)

Meeting issues, including the original announcement of this one, are
what made me finally put my name in for IAOC.  Unfortunately, we have  a
long (3 year) planning window so change takes more time than we'd all like.

Which of course is a partial answer to:

On 12/16/2015 11:36 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> Why are we continuing to have hotel issues meeting after meeting
> after meeting after meeting?

I also think another answer is documenting, and getting community
consensus on, what are the important and prioritized criteria for
selecting a meeting location and venue.  This is something I personally
hope to have time to work on in the next few months...

Lou

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status