Re: How IETF treats contributors
Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com> Mon, 30 August 2004 21:28 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA04539; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:28:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C1tj7-0000DE-GJ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:30:09 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C1tSf-0002LI-MK; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:13:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C1tC2-0003F0-SS for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:55:59 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA00774 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:55:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cirrus.av8.net ([130.105.36.66]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C1tDr-0007NT-Cy for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:57:52 -0400
Received: from cirrus.av8.net (cirrus.av8.net [130.105.36.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by cirrus.av8.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7UKtNnn029219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:55:24 -0400
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:55:23 -0400
From: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
X-X-Sender: dean@cirrus.av8.net
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06110403bd5906118d89@[129.46.227.161]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408301644050.28223-100000@cirrus.av8.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>
Subject: Re: How IETF treats contributors
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Ted Hardie wrote: > Variations on the idea of using a DNS record to check the legitimacy > of an email address have occurred multiple times. The earliest known > work is [Vixie]; others include [RMX], [SPF] and [CallerID]. But of course, this is wrong and is, in part, the basis of Hadmut's complaint. I've no doubt that Vixie is happy with this (as he reports), having obtained credit that isn't due to him. Apparently, no one bothered to actually read the message attributed to [Vixie], which the draft (wrongly) claims is the earliest known work: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2002/msg00658.html The idea came from David Green, and Vixie says it originated from Jim Miller in 1998. Vixie had little or nothing to do with it. Why the draft claims the earliest known work is due to Vixie is unclear. --Dean ========================================================================== * To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org * Subject: Re: Mail-Transmitter RR * From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com> * Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 18:16:37 -0700 * In-reply-to: Message from David Green <green@couchpotato.net> of "Sat, 01 Jun 2002 20:49:48 EDT."<Pine.LNX.4.44.0206012045470.8349-200000@david.couchpotato.net> > I'm sorry if this is off-topic, but I couldn't find a working group that > is working on dealing with spam, so this is the closest match I could > find. I know this is in no way related to IPv6 or anything else you guys > are working on, but it is an idea I had involving the addition of a RR > type. If this is not the right place to be sending this, any pointers to > other working groups/forums would be greatly appreciated. And I appreciate > all of the hard work you guys are doing... My idea is attached (domauth.txt) In 1998, Jim Miller suggested this. A few weeks ago, I wrote the following. Comments are welcome. ========================================================================== _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- How IETF treats contributors Hadmut Danisch
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Ted Hardie
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Paul Vixie
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Marc Blanchet
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Dean Anderson
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Dean Anderson
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Ted Hardie
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Dean Anderson
- Re: How IETF treats contributors william(at)elan.net
- RE: How IETF treats contributors Christian Huitema
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Dean Anderson
- Re: How IETF treats contributors John Day
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Clint Chaplin
- RE: How IETF treats contributors Thomas Gal
- RE: How IETF treats contributors Nick Carter
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Olaf M. Kolkman
- RE: How IETF treats contributors Scott Bradner
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Vernon Schryver
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Paul Vixie
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Paul Vixie
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Hadmut Danisch
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Hadmut Danisch
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Hadmut Danisch
- RE: How IETF treats contributors ned.freed
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Dean Anderson
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Dean Anderson
- Re: How IETF treats contributors william(at)elan.net
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: How IETF treats contributors Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: How IETF treats contributors ned.freed
- Re: How IETF treats contributors grenville armitage