Re: IESG and IETF Chair's Report

S Moonesamy <> Fri, 11 November 2016 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2941297C1; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:41:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.497
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.b=mRvXWvzJ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.b=n5GGFP17
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Zvm8ThNNN6Y; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:41:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9935C1297AC; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:41:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAB3f7mJ019753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:41:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1478835678; x=1478922078; bh=XrKd0bja4qyOCJLBc9yM4o3vyT9DlFgFmT809tvSu58=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=mRvXWvzJWXJvFMgoBLZ5UTfH8ysXxAr251W5f7/Hb+7UhE+Dj3W2SMs0J/G9rbt4O t0V90mkwA1xbn78YystrkMSTc8AM62rvuhzyOWznSl6lPHPD0/wDYxeLrHvAxDGyj6 t4i7udcQHf2JMSX6avuFwiZyE6NWmeix5khvSZjY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1478835678; x=1478922078;; bh=XrKd0bja4qyOCJLBc9yM4o3vyT9DlFgFmT809tvSu58=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=n5GGFP17yliVFYA84KfyZF5LE7lFC4uUBK1WMlNBGeZ5pgqW7fLXzL4lPII9pe900 9iSE6tXh/va8LkUE3K4dCktigt6AoJtloOT5jczR81vTsc9r9XHXVJbuEXENoAuXs9 FEHd/ZhhD7Zc29rG3nrWSTdPo7xAMIYRXAvagkds=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:35:13 -0800
To: IETF Chair <>
From: S Moonesamy <>
Subject: Re: IESG and IETF Chair's Report
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:41:21 -0000

Hi Jari,
At 18:31 10-11-2016, IETF Chair wrote:
>If you have additional topics that you think the IESG should, or 
>should already have, discussed, please send email to 
>with details and we'll get back to you.

I am sending this message to instead of 
as it is about a topic which has been discussed at length since 2014.

There is a message from Alexey about the next step on IETF mailing 
lists and DMARC at  It 
is better to talk about that at the plenary so that people are aware 
that the IESG is aware that there is a problem.  A "least worse 
change" may require a change in IETF policy.

S. Moonesamy