Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings
Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Wed, 19 March 2014 22:36 UTC
Return-Path: <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FBE1A0761 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.138
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.138 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3sLVsoCpwg_W for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.santronics.com (ftp.catinthebox.net [208.247.131.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEF21A07D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=isdg.net; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/relaxed; l=1211; t=1395268593; h=Received:Received: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject: List-ID; bh=/BwNDb4tK3PHa+0HQeyuFRa56tg=; b=bJQzA8wKtlK8nHiNO4IE Rl8oWxgfzK0DTgYf9kGZneFM7Qx2EiX7o6H27G1zgr78ljXPfjPy9pRe4OZPRt9w 4yI2dCLqOr6w/Wt/sh5nWaSNlzJLtXyJMM4pA221IbQLFpRce9esDWlV+4hAAmwu 7WoUznELXsWlUJmiUDLXzNs=
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.4) for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:36:33 -0500
Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com; dkim=pass header.d=beta.winserver.com header.s=tms1 header.i=beta.winserver.com; adsp=pass policy=all author.d=isdg.net asl.d=beta.winserver.com;
Received: from beta.winserver.com (hector.wildcatblog.com [208.247.131.23]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.4) with ESMTP id 256065713.1757.3680; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:36:33 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=beta.winserver.com; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/relaxed; l=1211; t=1395268571; h=Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject:List-ID; bh=PDqfJhd nePJmuPJc9yxOO+sgfZu49zDLIVkf8dNV9d0=; b=USLxyWsNWUeb0O/pVgmfjnM qY/zLe20CXHHrmguYrk8Jh1WL5aN7PpFNeUb7Qu7Q19j20smAO5RW4/xjRH9KDVx RsNpwb+of8Tj8iPajB0zoTIx8q4aqhHpQPuMSV9oMD9u9QCqG/knTqQDFROIVl/0 5yyGulVr6lC9nVzUcuJ4=
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.4) for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:36:11 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([99.121.4.27]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.4) with ESMTP id 3997294709.9.12580; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:36:10 -0400
Message-ID: <532A1BF0.1000502@isdg.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:36:32 -0400
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings
References: <5328F67A.2070605@att.com> <201403191925.s2JJPUQp005001@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1403191432160.21958@egate.xpasc.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1403191432160.21958@egate.xpasc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/swQckXEhJMbnfkJrYhGgkziOQN0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:36:50 -0000
+1 On 3/19/2014 5:38 PM, David Morris wrote: > > I'm not sure there is any point in asking folks in sales how they > use Powerpoint. Powerpoint is a tool and it can be used or abused. > Don't blame the messenger. Sales folks have information to convey > and technical folks have information to convey. How it is organized > can be good or bad whether there are no visual aids, are plastic slides > or are powerpoint slides. The issue isn't powerpoint, it is the user > of powerpoint. > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Dale R. Worley wrote: > >>> Actually, the article is not all one sided -- it does also discuss some >>> times when they feel that PowerPoint *is* useful. >> >> The whole *point* of PowerPoint is not to educate, but rather to >> *persuade*. Its *goal* is to make the audience stupid and prevent >> them from looking beneath the nicely-presented bullet points on the >> slides. If you don't believe me, talk to people involved in sales and >> see how they use the word "powerful" -- it means "words that cause >> people to act [in the way you want them to]". PowerPoint -- to make a >> powerful point. >> >> (OK, I've calmed down now...) >> >> Dale >> > > > -- HLS
- it's been a while since we discussed the use of P… Tony Hansen
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … John Levine
- RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use … l.wood
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Henning G Schulzrinne
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Dale R. Worley
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … David Morris
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Hector Santos
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … t.p.
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Yoav Nir
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Frank Solensky
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Scott Brim
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng)
- RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use … l.wood
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … Mukom Akong T.
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use … t.p.