IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: So, where to repeat?

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 08 August 2012 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97D921F86DA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eEkFVg7LjGWu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4E521F869C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [64.101.72.115] (unknown [64.101.72.115]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E54F4013D; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:18:59 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <5022AD8C.4020205@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:18:52 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat?
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF280CE839F@PACDCEXMB06.cable.comcast.com> <501EC24B.4080709@bbiw.net> <20120806120547.GA20379@crankycanuck.ca> <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA234677B967@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9B1@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <E4873516F3FC7547BCFE792C7D94039C02314C5E@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9E4@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <CAHBDyN5NLoJWMXEa8EdEVWxtUxm5XsuCjmqD4xn_N=2=7vKGXg@mail.gmail.com> <29F2EDD3-71B8-4762-8753-5C7AF369001B@tzi.org> <15DAC57C-82D5-4261-B0FA-4B700138DA2A@proto6.com> <79811B0A-FA21-456A-8016-BF20DF3FBD95@checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <79811B0A-FA21-456A-8016-BF20DF3FBD95@checkpoint.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:18:55 -0000

On 8/8/12 12:06 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Mileage varies. 
> 
> For me it was the shortest and cheapest flight of any IETF meeting I have attended.

If we discussed protocols the way we discuss venue sites, all would be
lost. "Oh, this feature works great for me, therefore let's include it
in the spec."

Perhaps we might consider ending these interminable venue discussions
and just complain three times a year when we visit a place that the IAOC
has selected?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email