Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 06 March 2015 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7D01ACDD1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:21:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rnUX_h-bAKBZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:21:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4BC1ACDD0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:21:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079AD2CF04; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:21:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c1BZJi4AdvrC; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:21:47 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861AF2CEEB; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:21:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7BF1E4B6-AF46-408A-B0CD-3028848B2E24"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [IAB] Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <22wq2us5b1.fsf@limac.netnod.se>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:21:47 +0200
Message-Id: <48519134-FB68-4441-8A40-56BFE6D1A2F3@piuha.net>
References: <20140520204238.21772.64347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <500031A0-DF45-409E-AACB-F79C32032E38@viagenie.ca> <94F2C35A-95D1-41CA-9CA5-2F7D59111E0B@vpnc.org> <E537C710-56D4-4009-B495-E6781A42893E@piuha.net> <22wq2us5b1.fsf@limac.netnod.se>
To: Lars-Johan Liman <liman@netnod.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/t1hu5wNa1E9R3riVEL1gDo9WbPY>
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:21:52 -0000

> If there are docs that specify what a host should do with such
> "malchecksummed" packets, I'm happy to put a pointer in there. If not,
> I'd rather avoid discussing it in this draft.

That may be the best approach. That is, not start specifying protocol in this document, unless it is just a reference.

FWIW, I re-read 1035 and 2181 and 768 quickly, and did not see such a statement. But I could have missed it. Or it may have been considered to be obvious :-)

Jari