Re: Citation bug in RFC 2425

braden@ISI.EDU Sat, 30 October 1999 00:20 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id UAA07801 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 20:20:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu (zephyr.isi.edu [128.9.160.160]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA04762 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 20:07:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: braden@ISI.EDU
Received: from gra.isi.edu (gra.isi.edu [128.9.160.133]) by zephyr.isi.edu (8.8.7/8.8.6) with SMTP id RAA26908; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 17:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 17:07:07 -0700
Posted-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 17:07:07 -0700
Message-Id: <199910300007.AA06709@gra.isi.edu>
Received: by gra.isi.edu (5.65c/4.0.3-6) id <AA06709>; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 17:07:07 -0700
To: braden@ISI.EDU, ietf@ietf.org, tlilley@perspex.com, phoffman@IMC.ORG
Subject: Re: Citation bug in RFC 2425

Paul,

I am glad that it was not a normative reference; this means that
standard is intact.  However, non-normative references have a function
too (else they wouldn't be there).  A dead citation is not a useful
citation.

Bob Braden