Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Mon, 30 June 2008 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575873A699F; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB143A6A4E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qDbuGphRhbTT for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [204.152.189.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D713A699F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.198] (c-71-198-3-247.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.3.247]) by virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55340265FAC; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <3B703143-E093-4EF5-A2D9-225DFA20ACB0@virtualized.org>
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <g49ju3$jn7$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:43:39 -0700
References: <4C0AE13D-4CA6-4989-A6B0-555A014DE464@multicasttech.com><74E3E26A-FCFB-45C1-989A-DD7EA5752974@virtualized.org><6.2.5.6.2.20080627121824.02c55340@resistor.net><BBB8E0B4-7E45-4BE9-B9DF-DEBE294585D6@multicasttech.com><6.2.5.6.2.20080627140118.02a43fd8@resistor.net><6F1CFDA0-A6E2-4257-8C72-0FCD1E117290@virtualized.org><6.2.5.6.2.20080628201322.02e43268@resistor.net> <FBBF3BB9-D231-494A-AFBE-7F816DD1180C@virtualized.org> <g49ju3$jn7$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Jun 29, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> | Executive summary:  Obsoletes RFC 952, updates RFC 1123,
> | defines  toplabel = letter 0*61( ldh ) letdig

So, TLDs starting with a number but containing non-numerics would be  
disallowed (I'm reminded of the fun long ago with 3com.com)?

Regards,
-drc

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf