Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP

Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org> Sun, 30 January 2011 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4963A6851; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:07:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.135, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tid-NTBZefCg; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org (expfe100-1.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.236]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762D43A6849; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:09:57 -0800
From: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:09:54 -0800
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
Thread-Index: AcvAruKab6Aanz9fQse61B69W+wxdgAAmQ2x
Message-ID: <C96AF782.2BAD0%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <2E96E191-26AD-41CA-A0BA-099276312814@virtualized.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:07:16 -0000

David has said this well.  Thank you.

Please let me know if there are any other questions.

--Michelle



On 1/30/11 10:52 AM, "David Conrad" <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:

> Cullen,
> 
> On Jan 29, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>>> AFAICT, the experts team reports to IANA. We make recommendations to
>>> them. They are the ones who have the conversation with the applicant.
>>> They can take our advice or not - that's their decision.
>> 
>> I think you are pretty misrepresenting the situation. My impression of the
>> reality of the situation is that if the IANA did not like the advice of the
>> expert reviewer, they might ask the AD to override but short of that they
>> pretty much do whatever the expert says.
> 
> 
> Joe is closer.  
> 
> In general, IANA staff are not technical experts in any of the wide variety of
> areas for which they are asked to provide registry services.  As such, they
> rely on technical experts to provide input/advice/recommendations.  In the
> past, there were some very rare cases in which the advice provided by the
> technical experts was deemed insufficient and IANA staff looked to the ADs or
> the IESG for additional input.  However, at least historically, IANA staff
> viewed the maintenance of the registries as their responsibility (at the
> direction of the IESG), not the technical experts' responsibility. I would be
> surprised if this had changed.
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf