IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 11 February 2009 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1543A6980 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:32:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GJeTH5FyuQ16 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:32:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B6C3A6928 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:32:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.4.Alpha0/8.14.4.Alpha0) with ESMTP id n1BLW0hL013244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:32:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1234387930; x=1234474330; bh=TU2luwtz/WYkdmo0AKYCI4fSDuX65p5iGWhC2ddBi8M=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=hwjt07tWjYqT8C9ZXWrdzLLAh0z1WCnhS/mbb2QfrdaP7IK2XtdYnmEcY2Q7OLFKf Z2KELaUW/W51/wrQxlqbYaxf9W0va10/q7nFyJMqVdPAOELx8SIIFuwiUpGl3cNjo5 JHiBjQfbRn6AJAzwSB2+dxHm7FYSDoKR7yQuvOPA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=15CcWtfQa57pBvth4LZzfOxj3zuMB5CgO+8avsOd+AvvXqV6kUjEgbWh+EmhAPOzB NBg7iDL3l4rWQtXEVMg7J+zLsc//9UJH62h9/U5VgD6ABAxGVOEcw7dqMBWvGj9luZP zmg3H1jGOHexwFCuAuDGKCythbqW++W9h8LVXhI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20090211132021.02cf3260@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:30:59 -0800
To: Tim Polk <tim.polk@nist.gov>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
In-Reply-To: <1A253EA8-BCF7-47D7-9A68-C9A7DE1423E8@nist.gov>
References: <20090211053342.C765E50822@romeo.rtfm.com> <1A253EA8-BCF7-47D7-9A68-C9A7DE1423E8@nist.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:32:10 -0000

At 11:37 11-02-2009, Tim Polk wrote:
>I will rectify the situation this week and request that the TLS WG
>review
>the document to gauge interest in this area.  I would be delighted to

Are you requesting that the TLS WG review an Internet-Draft that 
expired in December 2006?

Regards,
-sm

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status