Re: Observations on (non-technical) changes affecting IETF operations

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Mon, 07 March 2016 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E671B4103 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 05:39:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tEZ8U__Vw4di for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 05:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8221B4106 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 05:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.15.1/8.14.9) with SMTP id u27DdirR020991 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:39:44 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 08:39:44 -0500
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Observations on (non-technical) changes affecting IETF operations
Message-ID: <20160307133944.GB25576@gsp.org>
References: <E83FC2B4-867D-44C9-AE1B-F4C414ABD041@piuha.net> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657DF2330@dfweml701-chm> <EDFB7D0B-2A49-46BD-A84C-0E1FA07793FA@piuha.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EDFB7D0B-2A49-46BD-A84C-0E1FA07793FA@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tEolFzb1AV4pgbVx_SLH0w4HDkw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:39:49 -0000

On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:58:19PM +0000, Jari Arkko wrote:
> However, from my perspective there are some pretty big things in the
> works and big problems that people should solve, for instance:

[snip]

> * privacy in the Internet
> * security in the Internet of Things

These are connected and in desperate need of serious attention.  I've
spent some of the past few years studying these areas and the situation
is awful...and getting worse in a hurry.  The rush to market new devices
has turned into a stampede, with the accompanying construction of enormous
data-rich repositories, often stuffed full of data collected without
informed consent and lacking even a token level of security.

I think the IETF could (and should) make substantial contributions
in this area.  But if we're going to do so, we need to dive in now.

---rsk