IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Fri, 03 August 2012 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956D321F8E4C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n4tQ33vLWPXt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com (exprod7og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2FF21F8E49 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUBw47+nVHael0wHDfPeyU3xDTyIxFuL6@postini.com; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:47:45 PDT
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:46:18 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 16:44:24 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "Perala, Timo (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <timo.perala@nsn.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:44:22 -0400
Subject: RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
Thread-Topic: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
Thread-Index: Ac1xj/voWkczdU64TbyobebL9zrOywAIyhWwAAFmafA=
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D771652E13@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <20120802164551.20569.2082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FEF37558-FA51-4D8E-A6E9-654716CC3484@magma.ca> <4AF3E8170315EC458F9110B8F9DEDAA801AF275C@FIESEXC016.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AF3E8170315EC458F9110B8F9DEDAA801AF275C@FIESEXC016.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 20:47:47 -0000

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Perala, Timo (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 4:05 PM
> To: IETF Discussion
> Subject: RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
> 
> +1
> 
> Timo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> ext Philip Matthews
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 8:10 PM
> 
> I would personally prefer if the meeting was rescheduled for the week
> of April 3 - 8.
> - Philip
> 
> On 2012-08-02, at 9:45 , IETF Administrative Director wrote:
> 
> > The IAOC is seeking community feedback on a proposed date change for
> IETF 95
> > scheduled for March 2016.
> >
> > Currently IETF 95 is scheduled for 27 March to 1 April 2016.  27
> March
> is Easter.
> >
> > The IAOC is proposing IETF 95 be rescheduled for 20 - 25 March 2016
> and would like
> > feedback on those dates before making a decision.  Comments
> appreciated to ietf@ietf.org
> > by 6 August 2012.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email