Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
sob@harvard.edu (scott bradner) Fri, 10 September 2004 19:44 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA26810; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:44:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5rOE-0006Jr-NQ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:48:59 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C5r7S-0007hX-FA; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:31:38 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C5qyU-0001bo-L1 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:22:22 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA24999 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:22:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu ([140.247.60.212] helo=newdev.harvard.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5r2a-0005kS-UI for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:26:38 -0400
Received: by newdev.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4468B87159; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:21:49 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20040910192149.4468B87159@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:21:49 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aafa0432175920a4b3e118e16c5cb64
Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0a7aa2e6e558383d84476dc338324fab
Bob sez: > On the other hand, the expiration does (should) limit > the ability to reference I-Ds as if they really existed. my experience is far more "should" than "does" as an editor I'm getting more and more manuscripts that refer to IDs by file name (I ask that the references be changed but ...) and I'm seeing more and more such references in publications all the time > in real academic publishing, as well > as in IETF documents 10 years later, then the referenced documents MUST > be archival. that would be nice but the growing number of URLs in such documents seems to be a sad fact of life (inlcuding in court decisions!) > Are you, or are you not, suggesting > that I-Ds should become archival in this very important sense? this is a hard question (I know, that is why you asked it) clearly, making an archive of old IDs available on the IETF web site would encourage people to see them as archive but I'm not sure how much more encouragement that is over today's reality - there are also much technology that is only available in expired IDs (and many lessons on what not to do could be learned by seeing what did not make it through to the final RFC) The reasons I'd like to see an offical archive are: 1/ to make IPR prior art searches a little bit easier (at least the archive would be in an easy to find place) 2/ make it easier for the IETF to respond to discovery requests we could get some of the way there by just having the archive maintained "in the normal course of business" but not made public but if the material is actually public then we do not have to do anthing more than saying "look on our offical site" for that info and we do not need to produce the bits directly to the lawyers (responding to the discovery demands in the cases where I was involved took quite a bit of work at Foretec - they did it and did it well but it took them away from doing other things - and I do not expect that the IETF will stop getting requests in the future. 3/ these documents are part of the intellectual history of the IETF and its sad that we are hiding that the question of creating an assumption of archiveless is a byproduct of the above is a real question and I do not know the answer Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Melinda Shore
- archives (was The other parts of the report.... scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Stewart Bryant
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Scott W Brim
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian Huitema
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Pekka Savola
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Paul Hoffman / VPNC
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… John C Klensin
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Kai Henningsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian Huitema
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Melinda Shore
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Melinda Shore
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Kai Henningsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bob Braden
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Eric Rosen
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Steve Crocker
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Scott W Brim
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Vernon Schryver
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Kai Henningsen