IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Qualifying for NomCom

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 08 April 2016 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E385E12D642 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rHUTK9x5F8LD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712F212D5CA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c4so133316889vkb.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 03:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=NMgi/h+W3wjXOBfHonDpAIEEK2G17DhmrEvP4r/i2EM=; b=cedCTFyhDvslOLAPrtALlkW1qWExB9iW21mgzqiz1UpbFoRkTM07e2JrMJsctggns6 QCVUqSx0ws/QS8wee0kW0wtlysVr0lbJMvpbr1norUNrBu5cFdbLTpfexgxcG+O7fp6r nOdM4mr/YsVNEY9+pB3JPjJWAQivkvPK66s/0aECp3x+G7puh/f69Oei+5wdHhJphII0 vedaGj3yrDuJt9WJ88Kx00XUCnUfBVGVczg29l+nXa6YzqmtPda2JJFSSA7cjdCT3bFN M2gu8kicaDirUcPJuiAZi4YbfFfsloPXW/YTVSSZ5avfKBdqpNeTZHS4COwjKTsopcMf IIQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=NMgi/h+W3wjXOBfHonDpAIEEK2G17DhmrEvP4r/i2EM=; b=ZanyPeH3tYhugbCBRTfRxDIoRQm8oGiMLdtwg/tczJTYDZItMiqc/7zY88C2tOiim5 CjAjBqFrAib+PARaLlcUs8JZX5CDUqm905NiUu2YaTlhbDGLskccUxXoNeBhuZv6vJK6 /xawGzKpA52MsZ9pRi4LtdLvYXigXUVlrnOFMmQVz6uxtsiT+EIGGhPO9gYHw+3wrlHm ni7ZAYWPToaaJxpYXB+S6nH2loIG9xS+i64DYa2mNwiFF7FvmSPc0eDgb0Rhwjxs9hdB 0ip3HPZg6V9jIhYPls9cCH8JxV/+cS7Xr8BHIbgcGWefjwVi7tviWXYhC/s0z9vS47xZ jwRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIeIroChAT2GBP42YRGDT3D0KmiqBr1OapJ3+Zy1SL4TFd8LGz+RD0e6RFTUga63XTrF6oePrcdd5SHgg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.188.142 with SMTP id m136mr3806190vkf.89.1460112899643; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 03:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.43.5 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0043FB5E-3688-4230-A4CA-C743E7321FF7@gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY0FuDp5=RMFEhUMtkK=XNDxX2dogvVY7+OSy88jrrvOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=SYpo-CiHoc07Ukb04Kb1LGV2=BPPyRLUsaqyLM9Hbwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbhYRqw7fXHzYY0=W-CpmeHeDdaZx3z2Qg0cA2aMrmVwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nqmC7NJyg2M6Na8vUj8T-qObO-1gHFEXZzrobb3oOQhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZHGa5OvSmZ=bTd6AWchsm4r=QaJn2nPqD+YjeWPmH9pA@mail.gmail.com> <24691.1460062367@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <5706CC94.3080804@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYvCpL9wwHL0E33HRbMvcckpad=gV-VYgAomJpCdiSrpg@mail.gmail.com> <5E36120B-6D4E-4C0D-9905-2C698455D395@att.com> <CAL0qLwak6GRDYAcYqdOewoSmRj6DP5ptQKjqXkOedBaHcKC7WA@mail.gmail.com> <60B61524-EFF7-4489-A0C7-AA4A139FEF6C@att.com> <CAL0qLwYDW_zwfdr4-2=r0vt2Cb1wNFm+-aog0Wubu+8PbaYWEw@mail.gmail.com> <6012C604-0922-4582-A505-F7934B5FD903@att.com> <0043FB5E-3688-4230-A4CA-C743E7321FF7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:54:59 -0300
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaccAX3drzCEvnimqzx3YBnTgt0jOChVCi6F=n3jk46Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Qualifying for NomCom
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143026eb720a4052ff7065b"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tKErJ1jq_D2bq8yfLejtezCL5Go>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:55:02 -0000

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> ISTM that regardless of how the questions are phrased, this experiment is
> rigged to succeed.
> [...]
>

Do you have any suggestions?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email