IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com

Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com> Tue, 29 October 2013 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305C311E81CC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QWIr5zNZmL7H for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x233.google.com (mail-pb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAAB21E8094 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id wz7so491867pbc.38 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GjQoXRiQBqoEZ1NogV99ii1hGqM75AcWLtv1jzKC7nI=; b=MwAQ1b78ptRmmJudp2pW1iWsM9GLQmuIrozl0OcpLSX0TtepnJ3nNveKdNbyzpQ4aR 5ms/DOu3U4aT4jnysT0l0JKC+2hTfRIRRSEcU/tvVjJap7uAmp03XUaLYiOXuG5umI84 cXWXHYH0D0TexL1vyhwot4CigE+dSVcsIYGPylHeajzLtuFvSKidqTKYs/W4CDFpljJb SX4x4VXcVPHtE+u9rMSr+OFOHUk+L2qyYnZ2AfdeW1TwHd8W3oM2YpzxSGau3YpH7yZj /vFLy3+4dK16xnbeHaGxzfQ8XEpxvvuw8G49v8ubueZEXdsE9CrWvJHPf8qVBdBmU3Yt +WnA==
X-Received: by 10.66.196.168 with SMTP id in8mr2805671pac.18.1383086285138; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.54] (107-0-5-6-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [107.0.5.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dq3sm37168671pbc.35.2013.10.29.15.38.03 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
From: Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <01OZZW7T12OY00004R@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:38:02 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <74F37EA0-42CD-4805-80CB-1C060F79FEB7@gmail.com>
References: <5262FB95.8080500@gmail.com> <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com> <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com> <m21u3d5zvo.wl%randy@psg.com> <5266B4A4.9020301@dcrocker.net> <5266C6CA.30900@gmail.com> <0B5A250AE70FD6B21DD3CF4C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5266CE7C.2020503@gmail.com> <61EE8145-2184-44C1-8163-424F97F8286C@piuha.net> <m261sp3u13.wl%randy@psg.com> <7F387505-3EBD-4DEC-8E9C-AB6D500F5396@nominum.com> <CAPv4CP-UPr5S8Z5PqF1bX0FWLOCZvrgjFog6-O-R8tN+ygVTCA@mail.gmail.com> <CF9872C2-828D-4C56-8A8D-836FF1BCDAA9@nominum.com> <m28uxkyovt.wl%randy@psg.com> <01OZZW7T12OY00004R@mauve.mrochek.com>
To: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: ietf discuss <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:43:40 -0000

On Oct 25, 2013, at 9:53 AM, ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:

>> the chilling effect of vigilateism is far worse than spam or trolls.
>> we've been dealing with the latter for decades, and there is little
>> actual real harm if any.  the chilling effect of vigilanteism causes
>> actual harm and reduces the rich diversity of opinion, culture, and
>> viewpoint.
> 
> I could not agree more. By condoning such measures people are damaging the
> diversity they are supposedly trying to support.

Agreed.  Not all interests will be met but each should have a voice within an open and transparent process.  It would be a pity to allow censorship or political propriety to place this process behind hidden barriers.

Regards,
Douglas Otis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email