IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Tue, 22 October 2013 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1007c7129b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83ED511E8284 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6xWYQJKpQgNf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [213.172.48.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD1411E821F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1382479342; x=1383084142; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID: Thread-Topic:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=XPDZTWGiM5wfNOm99SgESumnp Qtrabna8iHo5Gn0/sE=; b=Dg+0/e22G8Z1qDby3geUfF1CMqfCTfQmbiYrEromM Cz00lirHZNcWQLl18qIDC+3CzUz4+bXtaQhtzEAOtYfkZq5IEU3oB50hCn2zm53/ LFUq0ncVo0FVkg1K4oO1SEoCMA851zt4IcamYCqj4tv6soHL0f4Yh9nnsgrpIvJr 6k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=hrmcbUa1RQTsPRoz5SoFTD9SRaMMC5ZzcjvsN5RtRxKEmDpTePpHBReiz8bS SSr098CcfMl3KRljER1rJX1UF3A4Q0S2oe4Qp6nV1ehdVj6vdG5PnbrRX VoGaKN+2M6AeQGxL92kpLImZYUyfCQQo4tcvJ9HZNPuV1T1ER4tOPs=;
X-MDAV-Processed: consulintel.es, Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:02:22 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.102] by consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50004495667.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:02:21 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: consulintel.es, Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:02:21 +0200 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:131022:md50004495667::5FG4PL91wskc99LQ:000084js
X-MDRemoteIP: 87.216.40.21
X-Return-Path: prvs=1007c7129b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:01:46 +0200
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: Ted.Lemon@nominum.com, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CE8CC0B9.B9B46%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <DD0DDB9E-0542-44FB-B4C6-1BDF86654841@nominum.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:02:30 -0000

I may have worded out too quickly my email, and actually looks like it was
more important for my decision the anonymity issue vs the off-top
question, but is still my opinion that this address must be banned.

We could take a decision on future anonymous postings, if required, I'm
always pro-privacy, but I don't think this is applicable in IETF works,
and this include exploders. Again this is my personal point of view.

Regards,
Jordi






-----Mensaje original-----
De: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Responder a: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Fecha: martes, 22 de octubre de 2013 23:13
Para: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
CC: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com

>On Oct 22, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Right, but as a matter of public record,
>> 
>>  "As Sergeant-at-arms, I agree with other previous
>>  postings and believe that anonymous posting is not
>>  tolerable in the IETF mail exploders."
>> 
>> really should not be allowed to stand.
>
>Let's give Jordi some time to respond.   I don't think he reads the list
>more than once a day, so he's probably innocently wondering why his ears
>are burning.
>



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email