Re: IETF Logo Wear

Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> Thu, 19 August 2010 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE963A695B; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTj8u+Pqgppn; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A263A6857; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F49C39E80FF; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x5h5ZG3IBygC; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs-32-24.cs.ucla.edu (Cs-32-24.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.32.24]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9643139E80DB; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF Logo Wear
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1008180823480.780@pita.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:59 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BE5EECA8-8125-4B76-B369-724D93AF2CB2@cs.ucla.edu>
References: <20100816152653.C48183A6765@core3.amsl.com> <AANLkTik=3OJuXAVXgxTJbz7uWtpVdAu0P6i=RGh5TQep@mail.gmail.com> <5CF029D3-B740-48E8-B66B-9C6F0E1472CC@cisco.com> <2B02F5BB-F62B-4E2C-AB16-C97C2EDAF124@cisco.com> <4C69B012.20001@dcrocker.net> <4C34E2CE1FA7B0A7B1B28C35@PST.JCK.COM> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1008180823480.780@pita.cisco.com>
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, John C Klensin <john@jck.com>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Philip Nesser <phil@nesser.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:19:31 -0000

On Aug 18, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:

> But his T-shirt says "IP *on* Everything" which makes it funnier.
> 
> http://jboss-uat.crn.com/channel-encyclopedia/definition-print.htm?term=IP+on+Everything&printType=image
> 
> Ole

my english is not good, but doesn't "on" carry more significant meaning over "over"?
over only means that ip pkts get carried over (so the everything here only means different carrier)

with on, "everything" can have a much broader range, from your toaster to mars


> 
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> --On Monday, August 16, 2010 14:39 -0700 Dave CROCKER
>> <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 8/16/2010 2:30 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
>>>> or http://www.pdphoto.org/PictureDetail.php?mat=&pg=7634
>>> 
>>> Given that the pun is based on Vint's observing that we had IP
>>> running "over" all sorts of different media, as I recall his
>>> comment was "IP over Everything".
>> 
>> Yes.  His comment and his tee-shirt.
>> 
>>   john
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>>