IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Fri, 18 March 2016 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7448112D509 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=heard@pobox.com header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFzADnou1WYB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (pb-smtp0.pobox.com [208.72.237.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AB4612D89F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD554C7C3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=sasl; bh=AqN3Kp uYzzx8H5az9X2+ToBY1tE=; b=Q8toi1Hg0uErZ2ueYXXxVv+I7d27xyej6t4DjD PMNmaW3TfP6yctNZC5aMrwKTWFJ46xdbnBBY12WYKknG0Bzjdi/2BMC6q/CJ5WRJ PTu167K8gTMeDGsTIH/ymJUmEUIrt+J6TXr+l4icbuG6KnGtjf5QrihX/3hIGT9K 84+sc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b= hjT2AnocA9za7/1RHZGgMgunTZuGLfKVoVSBXqQETwxUDz5h3MOt/NDQ3yl17Eh4 DzFEN+NeeD8pQRO1R7cxPowBJt32Vy9rWaU7fUKmXS32gvFLz7Wv32RjdqWAD1o+ j/lhxNKdyr5JTAbj7OGUp6Km2MoqcVCv8Z6Gdx1DkX4=
Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C224C7C2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-f48.google.com (unknown [209.85.213.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C8304C7C1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id e185so145874104vkb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLMblw1rlwxxSonmZhIKOdgYX3SzwHLkwKIR+M4uvVGfP/AmhoiR79ZATc/nlph1HA/jV69C9BE3H0Y8A==
X-Received: by 10.31.4.208 with SMTP id 199mr15611408vke.110.1458315689592; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.63.15 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:41:10 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VGor9_CQNNNw1Sc5wgkLoZnPbkTu2LwTtzpORqzNA9utw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VGor9_CQNNNw1Sc5wgkLoZnPbkTu2LwTtzpORqzNA9utw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142a4d2a61d07052e5494cd"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E2456056-ED1F-11E5-A9C7-79226BB36C07-06080547!pb-smtp0.pobox.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tdlG0nTSk915LKfifSy2Zhdj3Ss>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:41:35 -0000

Also, for IPv8, the status change document should reclassify RFC 1622
(which defined the IPv8 packet formats) in addition to RFC 1621 (which
defined the IPv8 architecture).  The registry should probably be updated
to reference both of those RFCs (it currently includes only RFC 1621).

Mike Heard

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:55:20 +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> The registry also assigns 7 to TP/IX, which became CATNIP.
>
> So 7 also needs to be changed to Reserved and RFC1707 and RFC1475
> both need to become Historic.
>
>
http://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers/version-numbers.xhtml#version-numbers-1
>
>    Brian
>
> On 18/03/2016 09:13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> If we are doing this, then I think that CATNIP (RFC1707) needs to be made
>> Historic at the same time, even though it didn't need an IP version
number.
>>
>> I also recall rumours that some people were actually using ST2 at one
point.
>> Are we sure that it's totally gone away?
>>
>> Regards
>>    Brian Carpenter
>>
>> On 18/03/2016 08:15, The IESG wrote:
>>>
>>> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
>>> Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document:
>>> - 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic'
>>>   <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic
>>>
>>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>>> ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally, comments
may be
>>> sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>>
>>> The file can be obtained via
>>>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/
>>>
>>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>>>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ballot/
>>>
>>>
>>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email